Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction

Low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) have become more widespread due to their low cost and increased capabilities; however, to supplement more traditional air quality networks, the performance of these LCSs needs to be validated. This study focused on NO<sub>2</sub> measurements from eigh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jason A. Miech, Levi Stanton, Meiling Gao, Paolo Micalizzi, Joshua Uebelherr, Pierre Herckes, Matthew P. Fraser
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/62b2902fb3e24eb8b64c3f52c60be69b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:62b2902fb3e24eb8b64c3f52c60be69b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:62b2902fb3e24eb8b64c3f52c60be69b2021-11-25T19:08:02ZCalibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction10.3390/toxics91102812305-6304https://doaj.org/article/62b2902fb3e24eb8b64c3f52c60be69b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/281https://doaj.org/toc/2305-6304Low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) have become more widespread due to their low cost and increased capabilities; however, to supplement more traditional air quality networks, the performance of these LCSs needs to be validated. This study focused on NO<sub>2</sub> measurements from eight Clarity Node-S sensors and used various environmental factors to calibrate the LCSs. To validate the calibration performance, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R<sup>2</sup>, and slope compared to reference measurements. Raw results from six of these sensors were comparable to those reported for other NO<sub>2</sub> LCSs; however, two of the evaluated LCSs had RMSE values ~20 ppb higher than the other six LCSs. By applying a sensor-specific calibration that corrects for relative humidity, temperature, and ozone, this discrepancy was mitigated. In addition, this calibration improved the RMSE, MAE, R<sup>2</sup>, and slope of all eight LCS compared to the raw data. It should be noted that relatively stable environmental conditions over the course of the LCS deployment period benefited calibration performance over time. These results demonstrate the importance of developing LCS calibration models for individual sensors that consider pertinent environmental factors.Jason A. MiechLevi StantonMeiling GaoPaolo MicalizziJoshua UebelherrPierre HerckesMatthew P. FraserMDPI AGarticlenitrogen dioxidelow-cost sensorsozoneair qualityChemical technologyTP1-1185ENToxics, Vol 9, Iss 281, p 281 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic nitrogen dioxide
low-cost sensors
ozone
air quality
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle nitrogen dioxide
low-cost sensors
ozone
air quality
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Jason A. Miech
Levi Stanton
Meiling Gao
Paolo Micalizzi
Joshua Uebelherr
Pierre Herckes
Matthew P. Fraser
Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
description Low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) have become more widespread due to their low cost and increased capabilities; however, to supplement more traditional air quality networks, the performance of these LCSs needs to be validated. This study focused on NO<sub>2</sub> measurements from eight Clarity Node-S sensors and used various environmental factors to calibrate the LCSs. To validate the calibration performance, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R<sup>2</sup>, and slope compared to reference measurements. Raw results from six of these sensors were comparable to those reported for other NO<sub>2</sub> LCSs; however, two of the evaluated LCSs had RMSE values ~20 ppb higher than the other six LCSs. By applying a sensor-specific calibration that corrects for relative humidity, temperature, and ozone, this discrepancy was mitigated. In addition, this calibration improved the RMSE, MAE, R<sup>2</sup>, and slope of all eight LCS compared to the raw data. It should be noted that relatively stable environmental conditions over the course of the LCS deployment period benefited calibration performance over time. These results demonstrate the importance of developing LCS calibration models for individual sensors that consider pertinent environmental factors.
format article
author Jason A. Miech
Levi Stanton
Meiling Gao
Paolo Micalizzi
Joshua Uebelherr
Pierre Herckes
Matthew P. Fraser
author_facet Jason A. Miech
Levi Stanton
Meiling Gao
Paolo Micalizzi
Joshua Uebelherr
Pierre Herckes
Matthew P. Fraser
author_sort Jason A. Miech
title Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
title_short Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
title_full Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
title_fullStr Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
title_full_unstemmed Calibration of Low-Cost NO<sub>2</sub> Sensors through Environmental Factor Correction
title_sort calibration of low-cost no<sub>2</sub> sensors through environmental factor correction
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/62b2902fb3e24eb8b64c3f52c60be69b
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonamiech calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT levistanton calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT meilinggao calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT paolomicalizzi calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT joshuauebelherr calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT pierreherckes calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
AT matthewpfraser calibrationoflowcostnosub2subsensorsthroughenvironmentalfactorcorrection
_version_ 1718410281269329920