Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Problems continue to exist with the reporting quality and risk of bias in search methods and strategies in systematic reviews and related review types. Peer reviewers who are not familiar with what is required to transparently and fully report a search may not be prepared to revi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Lex M. Bouter, David Moher, Ana Patricia Ayala, Jamie J. Kirkham, Maurice P. Zeegers |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/62ba011c539e40d087c2325eb5776bbd |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer support for smoking cessation: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Hyun-Ju Seo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A Systematic Review of Technology-Supported Peer Assessment Research
por: Lanqin Zheng, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Peer-reviewer index for Volume 33, 2020
por: Gustavo García Henao
Publicado: (2020) -
Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
por: Lilia Raitskaya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Faculty and Librarian Perceptions of Librarians as Researchers: Results from Semi-Structured Interviews
por: Maureen Babb
Publicado: (2021)