Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making

Abstract Global self-esteem is a component of individual personality that impacts decision-making. Many studies have discussed the different preferences for decision-making in response to threats to a person’s self-confidence, depending on global self-esteem. However, studies about global self-estee...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aya Ogasawara, Yoshiyuki Ohmura, Yasuo Kuniyoshi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/638894741bd2441a9ca79257019ee104
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:638894741bd2441a9ca79257019ee104
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:638894741bd2441a9ca79257019ee1042021-12-02T16:18:03ZReward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making10.1038/s41598-020-78635-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/638894741bd2441a9ca79257019ee1042020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78635-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Global self-esteem is a component of individual personality that impacts decision-making. Many studies have discussed the different preferences for decision-making in response to threats to a person’s self-confidence, depending on global self-esteem. However, studies about global self-esteem and non-social decision-making have indicated that decisions differ due to reward sensitivity. Here, reward sensitivity refers to the extent to which rewards change decisions. We hypothesized that individuals with lower global self-esteem have lower reward sensitivity and investigated the relationship between self-esteem and reward sensitivity using a computational model. We first examined the effect of expected value and maximum value in learning under uncertainties because some studies have shown the possibility of saliency (e.g. maximum value) and relative value (e.g. expected value) affecting decisions, respectively. In our learning task, expected value affected decisions, but there was no significant effect of maximum value. Therefore, we modelled participants’ choices under the condition of different expected value without considering maximum value. We used the Q-learning model, which is one of the traditional computational models in explaining experiential learning decisions. Global self-esteem correlated positively with reward sensitivity. Our results suggest that individual reward sensitivity affects decision-making depending on one’s global self-esteem.Aya OgasawaraYoshiyuki OhmuraYasuo KuniyoshiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Aya Ogasawara
Yoshiyuki Ohmura
Yasuo Kuniyoshi
Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
description Abstract Global self-esteem is a component of individual personality that impacts decision-making. Many studies have discussed the different preferences for decision-making in response to threats to a person’s self-confidence, depending on global self-esteem. However, studies about global self-esteem and non-social decision-making have indicated that decisions differ due to reward sensitivity. Here, reward sensitivity refers to the extent to which rewards change decisions. We hypothesized that individuals with lower global self-esteem have lower reward sensitivity and investigated the relationship between self-esteem and reward sensitivity using a computational model. We first examined the effect of expected value and maximum value in learning under uncertainties because some studies have shown the possibility of saliency (e.g. maximum value) and relative value (e.g. expected value) affecting decisions, respectively. In our learning task, expected value affected decisions, but there was no significant effect of maximum value. Therefore, we modelled participants’ choices under the condition of different expected value without considering maximum value. We used the Q-learning model, which is one of the traditional computational models in explaining experiential learning decisions. Global self-esteem correlated positively with reward sensitivity. Our results suggest that individual reward sensitivity affects decision-making depending on one’s global self-esteem.
format article
author Aya Ogasawara
Yoshiyuki Ohmura
Yasuo Kuniyoshi
author_facet Aya Ogasawara
Yoshiyuki Ohmura
Yasuo Kuniyoshi
author_sort Aya Ogasawara
title Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
title_short Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
title_full Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
title_fullStr Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
title_sort reward sensitivity differs depending on global self-esteem in value-based decision-making
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/638894741bd2441a9ca79257019ee104
work_keys_str_mv AT ayaogasawara rewardsensitivitydiffersdependingonglobalselfesteeminvaluebaseddecisionmaking
AT yoshiyukiohmura rewardsensitivitydiffersdependingonglobalselfesteeminvaluebaseddecisionmaking
AT yasuokuniyoshi rewardsensitivitydiffersdependingonglobalselfesteeminvaluebaseddecisionmaking
_version_ 1718384234151804928