Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers

Background: Respiratory protective equipment recommended in the UK for healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with COVID-19 comprises a fluid-resistant surgical mask (FRSM), except in the context of aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). We previously demonstrated frequent pauci- and asymptoma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark Ferris, Rebecca Ferris, Chris Workman, Eoin O'Connor, David A Enoch, Emma Goldesgeyme, Natalie Quinnell, Parth Patel, Jo Wright, Geraldine Martell, Christine Moody, Ashley Shaw, Christopher JR Illingworth, Nicholas J Matheson, Michael P Weekes
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021
Materias:
PPE
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/63fe9434a49f45088ced810afef01798
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:63fe9434a49f45088ced810afef01798
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:63fe9434a49f45088ced810afef017982021-12-01T14:32:57ZEfficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers10.7554/eLife.711312050-084Xe71131https://doaj.org/article/63fe9434a49f45088ced810afef017982021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://elifesciences.org/articles/71131https://doaj.org/toc/2050-084XBackground: Respiratory protective equipment recommended in the UK for healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with COVID-19 comprises a fluid-resistant surgical mask (FRSM), except in the context of aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). We previously demonstrated frequent pauci- and asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection HCWs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, using a comprehensive PCR-based HCW screening programme (Rivett et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2020). Methods: Here, we use observational data and mathematical modelling to analyse infection rates amongst HCWs working on ‘red’ (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) and ‘green’ (non-COVID-19) wards during the second wave of the pandemic, before and after the substitution of filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) respirators for FRSMs. Results: Whilst using FRSMs, HCWs working on red wards faced an approximately 31-fold (and at least fivefold) increased risk of direct, ward-based infection. Conversely, after changing to FFP3 respirators, this risk was significantly reduced (52–100% protection). Conclusions: FFP3 respirators may therefore provide more effective protection than FRSMs for HCWs caring for patients with COVID-19, whether or not AGPs are undertaken. Funding: Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, NHS Blood and Transfusion, UKRI.Mark FerrisRebecca FerrisChris WorkmanEoin O'ConnorDavid A EnochEmma GoldesgeymeNatalie QuinnellParth PatelJo WrightGeraldine MartellChristine MoodyAshley ShawChristopher JR IllingworthNicholas J MathesonMichael P WeekeseLife Sciences Publications LtdarticleCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2healthcare workerPPEmaskFFP3MedicineRScienceQBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENeLife, Vol 10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
healthcare worker
PPE
mask
FFP3
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
healthcare worker
PPE
mask
FFP3
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Mark Ferris
Rebecca Ferris
Chris Workman
Eoin O'Connor
David A Enoch
Emma Goldesgeyme
Natalie Quinnell
Parth Patel
Jo Wright
Geraldine Martell
Christine Moody
Ashley Shaw
Christopher JR Illingworth
Nicholas J Matheson
Michael P Weekes
Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
description Background: Respiratory protective equipment recommended in the UK for healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with COVID-19 comprises a fluid-resistant surgical mask (FRSM), except in the context of aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). We previously demonstrated frequent pauci- and asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection HCWs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, using a comprehensive PCR-based HCW screening programme (Rivett et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2020). Methods: Here, we use observational data and mathematical modelling to analyse infection rates amongst HCWs working on ‘red’ (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) and ‘green’ (non-COVID-19) wards during the second wave of the pandemic, before and after the substitution of filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) respirators for FRSMs. Results: Whilst using FRSMs, HCWs working on red wards faced an approximately 31-fold (and at least fivefold) increased risk of direct, ward-based infection. Conversely, after changing to FFP3 respirators, this risk was significantly reduced (52–100% protection). Conclusions: FFP3 respirators may therefore provide more effective protection than FRSMs for HCWs caring for patients with COVID-19, whether or not AGPs are undertaken. Funding: Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, NHS Blood and Transfusion, UKRI.
format article
author Mark Ferris
Rebecca Ferris
Chris Workman
Eoin O'Connor
David A Enoch
Emma Goldesgeyme
Natalie Quinnell
Parth Patel
Jo Wright
Geraldine Martell
Christine Moody
Ashley Shaw
Christopher JR Illingworth
Nicholas J Matheson
Michael P Weekes
author_facet Mark Ferris
Rebecca Ferris
Chris Workman
Eoin O'Connor
David A Enoch
Emma Goldesgeyme
Natalie Quinnell
Parth Patel
Jo Wright
Geraldine Martell
Christine Moody
Ashley Shaw
Christopher JR Illingworth
Nicholas J Matheson
Michael P Weekes
author_sort Mark Ferris
title Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
title_short Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
title_full Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
title_fullStr Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
title_sort efficacy of ffp3 respirators for prevention of sars-cov-2 infection in healthcare workers
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/63fe9434a49f45088ced810afef01798
work_keys_str_mv AT markferris efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT rebeccaferris efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT chrisworkman efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT eoinoconnor efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT davidaenoch efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT emmagoldesgeyme efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT nataliequinnell efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT parthpatel efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT jowright efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT geraldinemartell efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT christinemoody efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT ashleyshaw efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT christopherjrillingworth efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT nicholasjmatheson efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
AT michaelpweekes efficacyofffp3respiratorsforpreventionofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkers
_version_ 1718405062526500864