Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum]
Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1819–1824. Page 1819, Abstract, Patients and methods, line 1, “In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study” should read “In this non-randomized, controlled cross-sectional stu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | EN |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f09 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1819–1824. Page 1819, Abstract, Patients and methods, line 1, “In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study” should read “In this non-randomized, controlled cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and methods, line 1, “This consecutive prospective study” should read “This non-randomized, cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and Methods, Exclusion criteria section, line 5, “pachymetry >480 μm or <540 μm” should read “pachymetry <480 μm or >540 μm”.Page 1821, left column, Results section, line 13, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 7 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 7 eyes”.Page 1821, right column, Results section, line 12, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 9 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 9 eyes”.Page 1821, Table 1 is incorrect, the correct Table is shown in the pdf below and the HTML. Read the original article |
|---|