Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum]
Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1819–1824. Page 1819, Abstract, Patients and methods, line 1, “In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study” should read “In this non-randomized, controlled cross-sectional stu...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f09 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f09 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f092021-12-02T09:23:37ZShort wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f092018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/httpswwwdovepresscomcorrigendumshort-wave-automated-perimetry-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1819–1824. Page 1819, Abstract, Patients and methods, line 1, “In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study” should read “In this non-randomized, controlled cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and methods, line 1, “This consecutive prospective study” should read “This non-randomized, cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and Methods, Exclusion criteria section, line 5, “pachymetry >480 μm or <540 μm” should read “pachymetry <480 μm or >540 μm”.Page 1821, left column, Results section, line 13, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 7 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 7 eyes”.Page 1821, right column, Results section, line 12, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 9 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 9 eyes”.Page 1821, Table 1 is incorrect, the correct Table is shown in the pdf below and the HTML. Read the original articleZaky AGYassin ATEl Sayid SHDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 12, Pp 2313-2314 (2018) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 |
| spellingShingle |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 Zaky AG Yassin AT El Sayid SH Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| description |
Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1819–1824. Page 1819, Abstract, Patients and methods, line 1, “In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study” should read “In this non-randomized, controlled cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and methods, line 1, “This consecutive prospective study” should read “This non-randomized, cross-sectional study”.Page 1820, left column, Patients and Methods, Exclusion criteria section, line 5, “pachymetry >480 μm or <540 μm” should read “pachymetry <480 μm or >540 μm”.Page 1821, left column, Results section, line 13, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 7 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 7 eyes”.Page 1821, right column, Results section, line 12, “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in at least 1 hour in 9 eyes” should read “RNFL thickness measured by OCT was outside normal limits in 1 hour in 9 eyes”.Page 1821, Table 1 is incorrect, the correct Table is shown in the pdf below and the HTML. Read the original article |
| format |
article |
| author |
Zaky AG Yassin AT El Sayid SH |
| author_facet |
Zaky AG Yassin AT El Sayid SH |
| author_sort |
Zaky AG |
| title |
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| title_short |
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| title_full |
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| title_fullStr |
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [Corrigendum] |
| title_sort |
short wave–automated perimetry (swap) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma [corrigendum] |
| publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/6444cf266c024add8eb60c77ba814f09 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT zakyag shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucomacorrigendum AT yassinat shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucomacorrigendum AT elsayidsh shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucomacorrigendum |
| _version_ |
1718398124775440384 |