A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia

Abstract. Rozaki Z, Rahmawati N, Wijaya O, Mubarok AF, Senge M, Kamarudin MF. 2021. A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area of Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 2511-2518. This paper presents a case study of agroforestry (AF) practices and challenges...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuhud Rozaki, Nur Rahmawati, Oki Wijaya, ATIKAH FAJRIYAH MUBAROK, Masateru Senge, Mohd Fauzi Kamarudin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MBI & UNS Solo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/644c5e8923c0463693a00f9b8e4e6ad9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:644c5e8923c0463693a00f9b8e4e6ad9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:644c5e8923c0463693a00f9b8e4e6ad92021-11-22T12:14:18ZA case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia1412-033X2085-472210.13057/biodiv/d220661https://doaj.org/article/644c5e8923c0463693a00f9b8e4e6ad92021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://smujo.id/biodiv/article/view/8505https://doaj.org/toc/1412-033Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2085-4722Abstract. Rozaki Z, Rahmawati N, Wijaya O, Mubarok AF, Senge M, Kamarudin MF. 2021. A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area of Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 2511-2518. This paper presents a case study of agroforestry (AF) practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area of Indonesia. AF has been practiced by farmers in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area from older generation. Each area in Mt. Merapi has different types of AF such as agrisilviculture, silvopasture, and agrosilvopasture. In the village of Glagaharjo, Yogyakarta, this system has been used for land restoration or conservation. 139 AF adopters were chosen from 269 respondents that have been randomly interviewed from four different areas around Mt. Merapi. Statistical descriptive method using values of mean and percentage were used. Additionally, multinomial Logistic regression was utilized to understand the model. The findings of the study show that the trend of AF is increasing, especially in Glagaharjo, after the 2010 eruption. AF systems are also found to be practiced for mitigation strategies in facing Mt. Merapi hazards and risk, especially for crop protection, and land and water conservation. Promoting AF as one of the coping strategies in facing Mt. Merapi hazards and risk is important as indicated by the results of this study.Zuhud RozakiNur RahmawatiOki WijayaATIKAH FAJRIYAH MUBAROKMasateru SengeMohd Fauzi KamarudinMBI & UNS Soloarticleagroforestrychallengescontributionmerapi prone areaBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENBiodiversitas, Vol 22, Iss 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic agroforestry
challenges
contribution
merapi prone area
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle agroforestry
challenges
contribution
merapi prone area
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Zuhud Rozaki
Nur Rahmawati
Oki Wijaya
ATIKAH FAJRIYAH MUBAROK
Masateru Senge
Mohd Fauzi Kamarudin
A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
description Abstract. Rozaki Z, Rahmawati N, Wijaya O, Mubarok AF, Senge M, Kamarudin MF. 2021. A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area of Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 2511-2518. This paper presents a case study of agroforestry (AF) practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area of Indonesia. AF has been practiced by farmers in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard-prone area from older generation. Each area in Mt. Merapi has different types of AF such as agrisilviculture, silvopasture, and agrosilvopasture. In the village of Glagaharjo, Yogyakarta, this system has been used for land restoration or conservation. 139 AF adopters were chosen from 269 respondents that have been randomly interviewed from four different areas around Mt. Merapi. Statistical descriptive method using values of mean and percentage were used. Additionally, multinomial Logistic regression was utilized to understand the model. The findings of the study show that the trend of AF is increasing, especially in Glagaharjo, after the 2010 eruption. AF systems are also found to be practiced for mitigation strategies in facing Mt. Merapi hazards and risk, especially for crop protection, and land and water conservation. Promoting AF as one of the coping strategies in facing Mt. Merapi hazards and risk is important as indicated by the results of this study.
format article
author Zuhud Rozaki
Nur Rahmawati
Oki Wijaya
ATIKAH FAJRIYAH MUBAROK
Masateru Senge
Mohd Fauzi Kamarudin
author_facet Zuhud Rozaki
Nur Rahmawati
Oki Wijaya
ATIKAH FAJRIYAH MUBAROK
Masateru Senge
Mohd Fauzi Kamarudin
author_sort Zuhud Rozaki
title A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
title_short A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
title_full A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
title_fullStr A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia
title_sort case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in mt. merapi risk and hazard prone area of indonesia
publisher MBI & UNS Solo
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/644c5e8923c0463693a00f9b8e4e6ad9
work_keys_str_mv AT zuhudrozaki acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT nurrahmawati acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT okiwijaya acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT atikahfajriyahmubarok acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT masaterusenge acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT mohdfauzikamarudin acasestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT zuhudrozaki casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT nurrahmawati casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT okiwijaya casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT atikahfajriyahmubarok casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT masaterusenge casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
AT mohdfauzikamarudin casestudyofagroforestrypracticesandchallengesinmtmerapiriskandhazardproneareaofindonesia
_version_ 1718417679353643008