A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies

Abstract The Distal Tibia Nail (DTN; Mizuho, Japan) has demonstrated higher biomechanical stiffness to locking plates in previous research for A3 distal tibia fractures. It is here investigated as a fixation option for supramalleolar corrective osteotomies (SMOT). Sixteen Sawbones tibiae were implan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julia Greenfield, Philipp Appelmann, Yoann Lafon, Karine Bruyère-Garnier, Pol Maria Rommens, Sebastian Kuhn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6454cf4745bf42189afdcc2315b1ddde
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6454cf4745bf42189afdcc2315b1ddde
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6454cf4745bf42189afdcc2315b1ddde2021-12-02T17:27:19ZA comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies10.1038/s41598-021-97968-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6454cf4745bf42189afdcc2315b1ddde2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97968-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The Distal Tibia Nail (DTN; Mizuho, Japan) has demonstrated higher biomechanical stiffness to locking plates in previous research for A3 distal tibia fractures. It is here investigated as a fixation option for supramalleolar corrective osteotomies (SMOT). Sixteen Sawbones tibiae were implanted with either a DTN (n = 8) or Medial Distal Tibia Plate (MDTP; n = 8) and a SMOT simulated. Two surgical outcome scenarios were envisaged: “best-case” representing an intact lateral cortex, and “worst-case” representing a fractured lateral cortex. All samples were subjected to compressive (350 N, 700 N) and torsional (± 4 Nm, ± 8 Nm) testing. Samples were evaluated using calculated construct stiffness from force–displacement data, interfragmentary movement and Von Mises’ strain distribution. The DTN demonstrated a greater compressive stiffness for the best-case surgical scenario, whereas the MDTP showed higher stiffness (p < 0.05) for the worst-case surgical scenario. In torsional testing, the DTN proved more resistant to torsion in the worst-case surgical setup (p < 0.05) for both ± 4 Nm and ± 8 Nm. The equivalent stiffness of the DTN against the MDTP supports the use of this implant for SMOT fixation and should be considered as a treatment option particularly in patients presenting vascularisation problems where the MDTP is an inappropriate choice.Julia GreenfieldPhilipp AppelmannYoann LafonKarine Bruyère-GarnierPol Maria RommensSebastian KuhnNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Julia Greenfield
Philipp Appelmann
Yoann Lafon
Karine Bruyère-Garnier
Pol Maria Rommens
Sebastian Kuhn
A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
description Abstract The Distal Tibia Nail (DTN; Mizuho, Japan) has demonstrated higher biomechanical stiffness to locking plates in previous research for A3 distal tibia fractures. It is here investigated as a fixation option for supramalleolar corrective osteotomies (SMOT). Sixteen Sawbones tibiae were implanted with either a DTN (n = 8) or Medial Distal Tibia Plate (MDTP; n = 8) and a SMOT simulated. Two surgical outcome scenarios were envisaged: “best-case” representing an intact lateral cortex, and “worst-case” representing a fractured lateral cortex. All samples were subjected to compressive (350 N, 700 N) and torsional (± 4 Nm, ± 8 Nm) testing. Samples were evaluated using calculated construct stiffness from force–displacement data, interfragmentary movement and Von Mises’ strain distribution. The DTN demonstrated a greater compressive stiffness for the best-case surgical scenario, whereas the MDTP showed higher stiffness (p < 0.05) for the worst-case surgical scenario. In torsional testing, the DTN proved more resistant to torsion in the worst-case surgical setup (p < 0.05) for both ± 4 Nm and ± 8 Nm. The equivalent stiffness of the DTN against the MDTP supports the use of this implant for SMOT fixation and should be considered as a treatment option particularly in patients presenting vascularisation problems where the MDTP is an inappropriate choice.
format article
author Julia Greenfield
Philipp Appelmann
Yoann Lafon
Karine Bruyère-Garnier
Pol Maria Rommens
Sebastian Kuhn
author_facet Julia Greenfield
Philipp Appelmann
Yoann Lafon
Karine Bruyère-Garnier
Pol Maria Rommens
Sebastian Kuhn
author_sort Julia Greenfield
title A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
title_short A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
title_full A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
title_fullStr A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
title_full_unstemmed A comparative biomechanical study of the Distal Tibia Nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
title_sort comparative biomechanical study of the distal tibia nail against compression plating for the osteosynthesis of supramalleolar corrective osteotomies
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6454cf4745bf42189afdcc2315b1ddde
work_keys_str_mv AT juliagreenfield acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT philippappelmann acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT yoannlafon acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT karinebruyeregarnier acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT polmariarommens acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT sebastiankuhn acomparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT juliagreenfield comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT philippappelmann comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT yoannlafon comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT karinebruyeregarnier comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT polmariarommens comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
AT sebastiankuhn comparativebiomechanicalstudyofthedistaltibianailagainstcompressionplatingfortheosteosynthesisofsupramalleolarcorrectiveosteotomies
_version_ 1718380792601640960