Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return

Abstract Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaoyu Tang, Xueli Wang, Xing Peng, Qi Li, Chi Zhang, Aijun Wang, Ming Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/647b28c795634692958d1b8d47e873c9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:647b28c795634692958d1b8d47e873c9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:647b28c795634692958d1b8d47e873c92021-12-02T14:26:12ZElectrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return10.1038/s41598-021-86999-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/647b28c795634692958d1b8d47e873c92021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.Xiaoyu TangXueli WangXing PengQi LiChi ZhangAijun WangMing ZhangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xiaoyu Tang
Xueli Wang
Xing Peng
Qi Li
Chi Zhang
Aijun Wang
Ming Zhang
Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
description Abstract Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.
format article
author Xiaoyu Tang
Xueli Wang
Xing Peng
Qi Li
Chi Zhang
Aijun Wang
Ming Zhang
author_facet Xiaoyu Tang
Xueli Wang
Xing Peng
Qi Li
Chi Zhang
Aijun Wang
Ming Zhang
author_sort Xiaoyu Tang
title Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_short Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_full Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_fullStr Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_sort electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/647b28c795634692958d1b8d47e873c9
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyutang electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT xueliwang electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT xingpeng electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT qili electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT chizhang electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT aijunwang electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT mingzhang electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
_version_ 1718391371774033920