Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis

The article provides a comparative study of Afghanistan’s investment agreements. The aim was to determine Russia’s potential as a state supporting investments in Afghanistan’s economy. The analysis of investors was done on the basis of the Investment Map of the International Trade Center. Data on in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	E. V. Zhiryaeva, I. Mohammad
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2020
Materias:	investments investment agreements afghanistan protection of investments investment policy Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6483fcee71234f2da9a133005905cbf4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6483fcee71234f2da9a133005905cbf4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6483fcee71234f2da9a133005905cbf42021-11-12T10:46:12ZAfghanistan Investment Policy Analysis1726-11391816-859010.22394/1726-1139-2020-5-77-94https://doaj.org/article/6483fcee71234f2da9a133005905cbf42020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1421https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590The article provides a comparative study of Afghanistan’s investment agreements. The aim was to determine Russia’s potential as a state supporting investments in Afghanistan’s economy. The analysis of investors was done on the basis of the Investment Map of the International Trade Center. Data on investment flows are available from the statistical annex to the UNCTAD’s World Investment Report. The structure of Afghanistan’s investment treaties was presented on the UNCTAD website, on the International Investment Agreements Navigator page. Investment agreements of Afghanistan were analyzed according to the following plan: concessions within GATS, regional agreements, agreements with the countries of the West. GATS commitments provide sufficient space for investment in most areas other than the financial sector. The sphere of transport and construction, most developed by foreign investors, is opened to investment. Regional agreements with geographically and culturally close countries include the Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment among Member States of the Economic Cooperation Organization and the Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. They have greater sectoral openness. Investors are offered a range of benefits beyond the commonly used tax incentives. The threats posed by political instability are specifically addressed. Expropriation of investments is complicated by a general ban and the right to challenge it in the court. These provisions create a more favourable climate for investment in Afghanistan by other Islamic states. The treaty between Germany and Afghanistan reflects Germany’s desire to clarify bilateral investment relations, in particular, it lists examples of «less favourable» treatment. Under the Afghanistan-US agreement, it can be judged that the US probably does not expect the Afghan government to protect unilaterally their investments. For this purpose, a special body has been formed with the participation of the US Trade Representative. Another feature of this treaty is the US position expressed in it in the field of protection of workers’ rights. Russia appears to have sufficient GATS commitments and guarantees under the Afghan Private Investment Act to protect its projects. The next phase of cooperation could be an agreement on the promotion and mutual protection of investment, as a model of which the Afghanistan-Germany agreement could be taken. The construction projects in which Russia is most interested are not always interpreted as investments. This depends on whether the construction company’s representation is “permanent” in the host country. One more agreement — to avoid double taxation — could be questioned. However, Afghanistan does not have such agreements with any country.E. V. ZhiryaevaI. MohammadNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articleinvestmentsinvestment agreementsafghanistanprotection of investmentsinvestment policyPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 5, Pp 77-94 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	investments investment agreements afghanistan protection of investments investment policy Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
spellingShingle	investments investment agreements afghanistan protection of investments investment policy Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 E. V. Zhiryaeva I. Mohammad Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
description	The article provides a comparative study of Afghanistan’s investment agreements. The aim was to determine Russia’s potential as a state supporting investments in Afghanistan’s economy. The analysis of investors was done on the basis of the Investment Map of the International Trade Center. Data on investment flows are available from the statistical annex to the UNCTAD’s World Investment Report. The structure of Afghanistan’s investment treaties was presented on the UNCTAD website, on the International Investment Agreements Navigator page. Investment agreements of Afghanistan were analyzed according to the following plan: concessions within GATS, regional agreements, agreements with the countries of the West. GATS commitments provide sufficient space for investment in most areas other than the financial sector. The sphere of transport and construction, most developed by foreign investors, is opened to investment. Regional agreements with geographically and culturally close countries include the Agreement on Promotion and Protection of Investment among Member States of the Economic Cooperation Organization and the Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. They have greater sectoral openness. Investors are offered a range of benefits beyond the commonly used tax incentives. The threats posed by political instability are specifically addressed. Expropriation of investments is complicated by a general ban and the right to challenge it in the court. These provisions create a more favourable climate for investment in Afghanistan by other Islamic states. The treaty between Germany and Afghanistan reflects Germany’s desire to clarify bilateral investment relations, in particular, it lists examples of «less favourable» treatment. Under the Afghanistan-US agreement, it can be judged that the US probably does not expect the Afghan government to protect unilaterally their investments. For this purpose, a special body has been formed with the participation of the US Trade Representative. Another feature of this treaty is the US position expressed in it in the field of protection of workers’ rights. Russia appears to have sufficient GATS commitments and guarantees under the Afghan Private Investment Act to protect its projects. The next phase of cooperation could be an agreement on the promotion and mutual protection of investment, as a model of which the Afghanistan-Germany agreement could be taken. The construction projects in which Russia is most interested are not always interpreted as investments. This depends on whether the construction company’s representation is “permanent” in the host country. One more agreement — to avoid double taxation — could be questioned. However, Afghanistan does not have such agreements with any country.
format	article
author	E. V. Zhiryaeva I. Mohammad
author_facet	E. V. Zhiryaeva I. Mohammad
author_sort	E. V. Zhiryaeva
title	Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
title_short	Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
title_full	Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
title_fullStr	Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
title_full_unstemmed	Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis
title_sort	afghanistan investment policy analysis
publisher	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/6483fcee71234f2da9a133005905cbf4
work_keys_str_mv	AT evzhiryaeva afghanistaninvestmentpolicyanalysis AT imohammad afghanistaninvestmentpolicyanalysis
_version_	1718430681446481920

Afghanistan Investment Policy Analysis

Ejemplares similares