The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial

Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shourui Huang, Ling Li, Jiali Liu, Xiujuan Li, Qingyang Shi, Ying Li, Yanping Liu, Mingxiu Li, Li Ma, Liang Ning, Xiaoyang Liao, Xihui Ying, Weiye Cai, Fuyu Yang, Tengfei Wang, Ru Guo, Weijie Ma, Wenzhu Chen, Jin Chen, Xin Sun
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e2021-11-15T01:20:09ZThe Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial1741-428810.1155/2021/7228033https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7228033https://doaj.org/toc/1741-4288Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a high-sensitivity group (HSG) (n = 109) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the highest sensitivity to pain and a low-sensitivity group (LSG) (n = 93) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the lowest sensitivity to pain. The duration of acupressure treatment was 4 weeks, and the patients were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary outcome was a change in the frequency of angina attacks from baseline. The secondary outcomes included nitroglycerin consumption, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score. Adverse events such as bleeding and subcutaneous haemorrhage were recorded in both groups. Results. The effect of acupressure compared with baseline on the prevention of angina pectoris in HSG was better than that in LSG at week 4 (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.691 and 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.569, 0.839]) and week 8 (IRR: 0.692 and 95% CI: [0.569, 0.839]). No significant difference between groups was found in the frequency of nitroglycerin consumption at week 4 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.863 and 95% CI: [0.147, 5.077]) or week 8 (OR = 1.426 and 95% CI: [0.211, 9.661]). Two themes in the questionnaire showed significantly different changes from baseline between the two groups. Scores on the angina frequency (AF) subscale had changed more from the baseline in the HSG at week 8 than in the LSG (mean difference (MD) = 3.807 and 95% CI: [0.673, 6.942]). Scores on the treatment satisfaction (TS) subscale had also changed more in the HSG than in the LSG at week 4 (MD = 3.651 and 95% CI: [0.327, 7.327]) and week 8 (MD = 4.220 and 95% CI: [0.347, 7.346]). One patient in the LSG reported bruising at the acupoint. No unexpected safety problems arose. Conclusions. This study showed that acupressure at acupoints with high sensitivity to pain may effectively reduce the frequency of stable angina pectoris episodes. This trial is registered with NCT03975140.Shourui HuangLing LiJiali LiuXiujuan LiQingyang ShiYing LiYanping LiuMingxiu LiLi MaLiang NingXiaoyang LiaoXihui YingWeiye CaiFuyu YangTengfei WangRu GuoWeijie MaWenzhu ChenJin ChenXin SunHindawi LimitedarticleOther systems of medicineRZ201-999ENEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Other systems of medicine
RZ201-999
spellingShingle Other systems of medicine
RZ201-999
Shourui Huang
Ling Li
Jiali Liu
Xiujuan Li
Qingyang Shi
Ying Li
Yanping Liu
Mingxiu Li
Li Ma
Liang Ning
Xiaoyang Liao
Xihui Ying
Weiye Cai
Fuyu Yang
Tengfei Wang
Ru Guo
Weijie Ma
Wenzhu Chen
Jin Chen
Xin Sun
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
description Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a high-sensitivity group (HSG) (n = 109) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the highest sensitivity to pain and a low-sensitivity group (LSG) (n = 93) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the lowest sensitivity to pain. The duration of acupressure treatment was 4 weeks, and the patients were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary outcome was a change in the frequency of angina attacks from baseline. The secondary outcomes included nitroglycerin consumption, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score. Adverse events such as bleeding and subcutaneous haemorrhage were recorded in both groups. Results. The effect of acupressure compared with baseline on the prevention of angina pectoris in HSG was better than that in LSG at week 4 (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.691 and 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.569, 0.839]) and week 8 (IRR: 0.692 and 95% CI: [0.569, 0.839]). No significant difference between groups was found in the frequency of nitroglycerin consumption at week 4 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.863 and 95% CI: [0.147, 5.077]) or week 8 (OR = 1.426 and 95% CI: [0.211, 9.661]). Two themes in the questionnaire showed significantly different changes from baseline between the two groups. Scores on the angina frequency (AF) subscale had changed more from the baseline in the HSG at week 8 than in the LSG (mean difference (MD) = 3.807 and 95% CI: [0.673, 6.942]). Scores on the treatment satisfaction (TS) subscale had also changed more in the HSG than in the LSG at week 4 (MD = 3.651 and 95% CI: [0.327, 7.327]) and week 8 (MD = 4.220 and 95% CI: [0.347, 7.346]). One patient in the LSG reported bruising at the acupoint. No unexpected safety problems arose. Conclusions. This study showed that acupressure at acupoints with high sensitivity to pain may effectively reduce the frequency of stable angina pectoris episodes. This trial is registered with NCT03975140.
format article
author Shourui Huang
Ling Li
Jiali Liu
Xiujuan Li
Qingyang Shi
Ying Li
Yanping Liu
Mingxiu Li
Li Ma
Liang Ning
Xiaoyang Liao
Xihui Ying
Weiye Cai
Fuyu Yang
Tengfei Wang
Ru Guo
Weijie Ma
Wenzhu Chen
Jin Chen
Xin Sun
author_facet Shourui Huang
Ling Li
Jiali Liu
Xiujuan Li
Qingyang Shi
Ying Li
Yanping Liu
Mingxiu Li
Li Ma
Liang Ning
Xiaoyang Liao
Xihui Ying
Weiye Cai
Fuyu Yang
Tengfei Wang
Ru Guo
Weijie Ma
Wenzhu Chen
Jin Chen
Xin Sun
author_sort Shourui Huang
title The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
title_short The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
title_full The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
title_fullStr The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
title_sort preventive value of acupoint sensitization for patients with stable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, multicentre trial
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e
work_keys_str_mv AT shouruihuang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT lingli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT jialiliu thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xiujuanli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT qingyangshi thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT yingli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT yanpingliu thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT mingxiuli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT lima thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT liangning thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xiaoyangliao thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xihuiying thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT weiyecai thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT fuyuyang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT tengfeiwang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT ruguo thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT weijiema thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT wenzhuchen thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT jinchen thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xinsun thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT shouruihuang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT lingli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT jialiliu preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xiujuanli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT qingyangshi preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT yingli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT yanpingliu preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT mingxiuli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT lima preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT liangning preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xiaoyangliao preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xihuiying preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT weiyecai preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT fuyuyang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT tengfeiwang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT ruguo preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT weijiema preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT wenzhuchen preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT jinchen preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
AT xinsun preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial
_version_ 1718428926293835776