The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial
Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e2021-11-15T01:20:09ZThe Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial1741-428810.1155/2021/7228033https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7228033https://doaj.org/toc/1741-4288Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a high-sensitivity group (HSG) (n = 109) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the highest sensitivity to pain and a low-sensitivity group (LSG) (n = 93) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the lowest sensitivity to pain. The duration of acupressure treatment was 4 weeks, and the patients were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary outcome was a change in the frequency of angina attacks from baseline. The secondary outcomes included nitroglycerin consumption, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score. Adverse events such as bleeding and subcutaneous haemorrhage were recorded in both groups. Results. The effect of acupressure compared with baseline on the prevention of angina pectoris in HSG was better than that in LSG at week 4 (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.691 and 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.569, 0.839]) and week 8 (IRR: 0.692 and 95% CI: [0.569, 0.839]). No significant difference between groups was found in the frequency of nitroglycerin consumption at week 4 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.863 and 95% CI: [0.147, 5.077]) or week 8 (OR = 1.426 and 95% CI: [0.211, 9.661]). Two themes in the questionnaire showed significantly different changes from baseline between the two groups. Scores on the angina frequency (AF) subscale had changed more from the baseline in the HSG at week 8 than in the LSG (mean difference (MD) = 3.807 and 95% CI: [0.673, 6.942]). Scores on the treatment satisfaction (TS) subscale had also changed more in the HSG than in the LSG at week 4 (MD = 3.651 and 95% CI: [0.327, 7.327]) and week 8 (MD = 4.220 and 95% CI: [0.347, 7.346]). One patient in the LSG reported bruising at the acupoint. No unexpected safety problems arose. Conclusions. This study showed that acupressure at acupoints with high sensitivity to pain may effectively reduce the frequency of stable angina pectoris episodes. This trial is registered with NCT03975140.Shourui HuangLing LiJiali LiuXiujuan LiQingyang ShiYing LiYanping LiuMingxiu LiLi MaLiang NingXiaoyang LiaoXihui YingWeiye CaiFuyu YangTengfei WangRu GuoWeijie MaWenzhu ChenJin ChenXin SunHindawi LimitedarticleOther systems of medicineRZ201-999ENEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol 2021 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Other systems of medicine RZ201-999 |
spellingShingle |
Other systems of medicine RZ201-999 Shourui Huang Ling Li Jiali Liu Xiujuan Li Qingyang Shi Ying Li Yanping Liu Mingxiu Li Li Ma Liang Ning Xiaoyang Liao Xihui Ying Weiye Cai Fuyu Yang Tengfei Wang Ru Guo Weijie Ma Wenzhu Chen Jin Chen Xin Sun The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
description |
Background. Acupoint sensitization is considered an important factor in the efficacy of acupoint therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of acupressure in the prevention of stable angina pectoris using acupoints with different pressure-pain sensitivities. Methods. A total of 202 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a high-sensitivity group (HSG) (n = 109) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the highest sensitivity to pain and a low-sensitivity group (LSG) (n = 93) in which patients received acupressure at the five acupoints with the lowest sensitivity to pain. The duration of acupressure treatment was 4 weeks, and the patients were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary outcome was a change in the frequency of angina attacks from baseline. The secondary outcomes included nitroglycerin consumption, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score. Adverse events such as bleeding and subcutaneous haemorrhage were recorded in both groups. Results. The effect of acupressure compared with baseline on the prevention of angina pectoris in HSG was better than that in LSG at week 4 (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.691 and 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.569, 0.839]) and week 8 (IRR: 0.692 and 95% CI: [0.569, 0.839]). No significant difference between groups was found in the frequency of nitroglycerin consumption at week 4 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.863 and 95% CI: [0.147, 5.077]) or week 8 (OR = 1.426 and 95% CI: [0.211, 9.661]). Two themes in the questionnaire showed significantly different changes from baseline between the two groups. Scores on the angina frequency (AF) subscale had changed more from the baseline in the HSG at week 8 than in the LSG (mean difference (MD) = 3.807 and 95% CI: [0.673, 6.942]). Scores on the treatment satisfaction (TS) subscale had also changed more in the HSG than in the LSG at week 4 (MD = 3.651 and 95% CI: [0.327, 7.327]) and week 8 (MD = 4.220 and 95% CI: [0.347, 7.346]). One patient in the LSG reported bruising at the acupoint. No unexpected safety problems arose. Conclusions. This study showed that acupressure at acupoints with high sensitivity to pain may effectively reduce the frequency of stable angina pectoris episodes. This trial is registered with NCT03975140. |
format |
article |
author |
Shourui Huang Ling Li Jiali Liu Xiujuan Li Qingyang Shi Ying Li Yanping Liu Mingxiu Li Li Ma Liang Ning Xiaoyang Liao Xihui Ying Weiye Cai Fuyu Yang Tengfei Wang Ru Guo Weijie Ma Wenzhu Chen Jin Chen Xin Sun |
author_facet |
Shourui Huang Ling Li Jiali Liu Xiujuan Li Qingyang Shi Ying Li Yanping Liu Mingxiu Li Li Ma Liang Ning Xiaoyang Liao Xihui Ying Weiye Cai Fuyu Yang Tengfei Wang Ru Guo Weijie Ma Wenzhu Chen Jin Chen Xin Sun |
author_sort |
Shourui Huang |
title |
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
title_short |
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
title_full |
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
title_fullStr |
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Preventive Value of Acupoint Sensitization for Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive-Controlled, Multicentre Trial |
title_sort |
preventive value of acupoint sensitization for patients with stable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, multicentre trial |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/64be19167c294d519a2f1bcac816ac7e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shouruihuang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT lingli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT jialiliu thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xiujuanli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT qingyangshi thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT yingli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT yanpingliu thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT mingxiuli thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT lima thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT liangning thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xiaoyangliao thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xihuiying thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT weiyecai thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT fuyuyang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT tengfeiwang thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT ruguo thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT weijiema thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT wenzhuchen thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT jinchen thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xinsun thepreventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT shouruihuang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT lingli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT jialiliu preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xiujuanli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT qingyangshi preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT yingli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT yanpingliu preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT mingxiuli preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT lima preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT liangning preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xiaoyangliao preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xihuiying preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT weiyecai preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT fuyuyang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT tengfeiwang preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT ruguo preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT weijiema preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT wenzhuchen preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT jinchen preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial AT xinsun preventivevalueofacupointsensitizationforpatientswithstableanginapectorisarandomizeddoubleblindpositivecontrolledmulticentretrial |
_version_ |
1718428926293835776 |