Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise

The article is devoted to the analysis of the political process of Germany’s abandonment of nuclear energy. The results of a comparative analysis of government decisions taken over the course of one decade, but different in nature and having different consequences for the nuclear industry are presen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	A. V. Zimakov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:	germany rejection of nuclear energy nuclear lobby anti-nuclear movement aps Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/64e97bc90d5242d298c2bb355dad7dea
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:64e97bc90d5242d298c2bb355dad7dea
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:64e97bc90d5242d298c2bb355dad7dea2021-12-02T07:58:15ZGermany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-359-377https://doaj.org/article/64e97bc90d5242d298c2bb355dad7dea2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3289https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article is devoted to the analysis of the political process of Germany’s abandonment of nuclear energy. The results of a comparative analysis of government decisions taken over the course of one decade, but different in nature and having different consequences for the nuclear industry are presented in the paper. Special attention is paid to the issue of interaction between the government and energy companies in the context of the decisions of 2002 and 2011. It is shown that the abandonment of atomic energy in 2002 was a compromise solution, taking into account both the political desire of society to stop the operation of the nuclear power plant, and the economic interests of energy concerns. The author analyzes the consequences of the unilateral decision of the FRG government in 2011, infringing on the interests of the nuclear lobby, which led to many years of litigation that ended in favor of energy concerns. A review of the final compromise agreements between the companies and the government governing the issue of fair compensation for the early shutdown of nuclear power plants was carried out. Based on a comparative analysis of the two decisions on Germany’s withdrawal from nuclear energy and their consequences, it is concluded that, when entire industries are closed for political reasons, consultations with the involvement of all interested parties are necessary to work out an acceptable compromise.A. V. ZimakovTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlegermanyrejection of nuclear energynuclear lobbyanti-nuclear movementapsSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 10, Pp 359-377 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	germany rejection of nuclear energy nuclear lobby anti-nuclear movement aps Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	germany rejection of nuclear energy nuclear lobby anti-nuclear movement aps Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 A. V. Zimakov Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
description	The article is devoted to the analysis of the political process of Germany’s abandonment of nuclear energy. The results of a comparative analysis of government decisions taken over the course of one decade, but different in nature and having different consequences for the nuclear industry are presented in the paper. Special attention is paid to the issue of interaction between the government and energy companies in the context of the decisions of 2002 and 2011. It is shown that the abandonment of atomic energy in 2002 was a compromise solution, taking into account both the political desire of society to stop the operation of the nuclear power plant, and the economic interests of energy concerns. The author analyzes the consequences of the unilateral decision of the FRG government in 2011, infringing on the interests of the nuclear lobby, which led to many years of litigation that ended in favor of energy concerns. A review of the final compromise agreements between the companies and the government governing the issue of fair compensation for the early shutdown of nuclear power plants was carried out. Based on a comparative analysis of the two decisions on Germany’s withdrawal from nuclear energy and their consequences, it is concluded that, when entire industries are closed for political reasons, consultations with the involvement of all interested parties are necessary to work out an acceptable compromise.
format	article
author	A. V. Zimakov
author_facet	A. V. Zimakov
author_sort	A. V. Zimakov
title	Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
title_short	Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
title_full	Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
title_fullStr	Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
title_full_unstemmed	Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
title_sort	germany’s nuclear energy refusal policy: from conflict to compromise
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/64e97bc90d5242d298c2bb355dad7dea
work_keys_str_mv	AT avzimakov germanysnuclearenergyrefusalpolicyfromconflicttocompromise
_version_	1718398725927206912

Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise

Ejemplares similares