Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen

In the so-called Anthropocene, we pose anew the question of what man is. If humankind wants to face present challenges, the preconditions of our “Weltanschauung” come into view. Whereas in the past one used to link cultures by factors such as geography or national identity, today it seems necessary...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Harald Schwaetzer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
Publicado: Universität Trier 2021
Materias:
art
P
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6529a11fda79411c9dff9b61c692c006
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6529a11fda79411c9dff9b61c692c006
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6529a11fda79411c9dff9b61c692c0062021-11-12T09:22:26ZKunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen 10.25353/ubtr-izfk-00bb-2c402698-492X2698-4938https://doaj.org/article/6529a11fda79411c9dff9b61c692c0062021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://izfk.uni-trier.de/index.php/izfk/article/view/IZfK-Vol-3-Kunst-und-Technik-der-menschlichen-mens-bei-Nikolaus-von-Kueshttps://doaj.org/toc/2698-492Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2698-4938In the so-called Anthropocene, we pose anew the question of what man is. If humankind wants to face present challenges, the preconditions of our “Weltanschauung” come into view. Whereas in the past one used to link cultures by factors such as geography or national identity, today it seems necessary to expand the parameters of cultural comparison. Therefore, different forms of consciousness have had to be analysed as different cultural types. Aiming to describe these forms, the 15th century view is of relevance because it sets the course for the modern reflexive form of consciousness and its sciences – but also its alternatives. With that in mind, this article will focus on the example of Nicholas of Cusa. It shows that art and technology can be understood as manifestations of two different types of consciousness. One type, concerning technology and science, refers to the “anima sensibilis”, including a discursive capacity oriented towards sensual perception. The other type legitimizes and guarantees the first and consists in judging; this pure, mental process has to be actively generated. Cusanus named this type of consciousness as “viva imago”, which forms itself towards a “viva substantia”. Harald SchwaetzerUniversität Trierarticlenicholas of cusaforms of consciousnessarttechniqueanthropologyanthropoceneLanguage and LiteraturePDEENInternationale Zeitschrift für Kulturkomparatistik, Vol 3, Pp 97-122 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
topic nicholas of cusa
forms of consciousness
art
technique
anthropology
anthropocene
Language and Literature
P
spellingShingle nicholas of cusa
forms of consciousness
art
technique
anthropology
anthropocene
Language and Literature
P
Harald Schwaetzer
Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
description In the so-called Anthropocene, we pose anew the question of what man is. If humankind wants to face present challenges, the preconditions of our “Weltanschauung” come into view. Whereas in the past one used to link cultures by factors such as geography or national identity, today it seems necessary to expand the parameters of cultural comparison. Therefore, different forms of consciousness have had to be analysed as different cultural types. Aiming to describe these forms, the 15th century view is of relevance because it sets the course for the modern reflexive form of consciousness and its sciences – but also its alternatives. With that in mind, this article will focus on the example of Nicholas of Cusa. It shows that art and technology can be understood as manifestations of two different types of consciousness. One type, concerning technology and science, refers to the “anima sensibilis”, including a discursive capacity oriented towards sensual perception. The other type legitimizes and guarantees the first and consists in judging; this pure, mental process has to be actively generated. Cusanus named this type of consciousness as “viva imago”, which forms itself towards a “viva substantia”.
format article
author Harald Schwaetzer
author_facet Harald Schwaetzer
author_sort Harald Schwaetzer
title Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
title_short Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
title_full Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
title_fullStr Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
title_full_unstemmed Kunst und Technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei Nikolaus von Kues. Bewusstseinsformen als Grundlagen von Kulturen
title_sort kunst und technik der menschlichen „mens“ bei nikolaus von kues. bewusstseinsformen als grundlagen von kulturen
publisher Universität Trier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6529a11fda79411c9dff9b61c692c006
work_keys_str_mv AT haraldschwaetzer kunstundtechnikdermenschlichenmensbeinikolausvonkuesbewusstseinsformenalsgrundlagenvonkulturen
_version_ 1718431052699009024