Determining the timing of pubertal onset via a multicohort analysis of growth.

<h4>Objective</h4>Growth-based determination of pubertal onset timing would be cheap and practical. We aimed to determine this timing based on pubertal growth markers. Secondary aims were to estimate the differences in growth between cohorts and identify the role of overweight in onset t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essi Syrjälä, Harri Niinikoski, Helena E Virtanen, Jorma Ilonen, Mikael Knip, Nina Hutri-Kähönen, Katja Pahkala, Olli T Raitakari, Wiwat Rodprasert, Jorma Toppari, Suvi M Virtanen, Riitta Veijola, Jaakko Peltonen, Jaakko Nevalainen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6564829621db43a7bd7f64c4b688ea29
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:<h4>Objective</h4>Growth-based determination of pubertal onset timing would be cheap and practical. We aimed to determine this timing based on pubertal growth markers. Secondary aims were to estimate the differences in growth between cohorts and identify the role of overweight in onset timing.<h4>Design</h4>This multicohort study includes data from three Finnish cohorts-the Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention (DIPP, N = 2,825) Study, the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project (STRIP, N = 711), and the Boy cohort (N = 66). Children were monitored for growth and Tanner staging (except in DIPP).<h4>Methods</h4>The growth data were analyzed using a Super-Imposition by Translation And Rotation growth curve model, and pubertal onset analyses were run using a time-to-pubertal onset model.<h4>Results</h4>The time-to-pubertal onset model used age at peak height velocity (aPHV), peak height velocity (PHV), and overweight status as covariates, with interaction between aPHV and overweight status for girls, and succeeded in determining the onset timing. Cross-validation showed a good agreement (71.0% for girls, 77.0% for boys) between the observed and predicted onset timings. Children in STRIP were taller overall (girls: 1.7 [95% CI: 0.9, 2.5] cm, boys: 1.0 [0.3, 2.2] cm) and had higher PHV values (girls: 0.13 [0.02, 0.25] cm/year, boys: 0.35 [0.21, 0.49] cm/year) than those in DIPP. Boys in the Boy cohort were taller (2.3 [0.3, 4.2] cm) compared with DIPP. Overweight girls showed pubertal onset at 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] year earlier compared with other girls. In boys, there was no such difference.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The novel modeling approach provides an opportunity to evaluate the Tanner breast/genital stage-based pubertal onset timing in cohort studies including longitudinal data on growth but lacking pubertal follow-up.