Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning
Abstract Identifying drug-target interaction (DTI) candidates is crucial for drug repositioning. However, usually only positive DTIs are deposited in known databases, which challenges computational methods to predict novel DTIs due to the lack of negative samples. To overcome this dilemma, researche...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/656e1bfed72c43d39dedc4ea57292f76 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:656e1bfed72c43d39dedc4ea57292f76 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:656e1bfed72c43d39dedc4ea57292f762021-12-02T11:40:14ZScreening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning10.1038/s41598-017-08079-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/656e1bfed72c43d39dedc4ea57292f762017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08079-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Identifying drug-target interaction (DTI) candidates is crucial for drug repositioning. However, usually only positive DTIs are deposited in known databases, which challenges computational methods to predict novel DTIs due to the lack of negative samples. To overcome this dilemma, researchers usually randomly select negative samples from unlabeled drug-target pairs, which introduces a lot of false-positives. In this study, a negative sample extraction method named NDTISE is first developed to screen strong negative DTI examples based on positive-unlabeled learning. A novel DTI screening framework, PUDTI, is then designed to infer new drug repositioning candidates by integrating NDTISE, probabilities that remaining ambiguous samples belong to the positive and negative classes, and an SVM-based optimization model. We investigated the effectiveness of NDTISE on a DTI data provided by NCPIS. NDTISE is much better than random selection and slightly outperforms NCPIS. We then compared PUDTI with 6 state-of-the-art methods on 4 classes of DTI datasets from human enzymes, ion channels, GPCRs and nuclear receptors. PUDTI achieved the highest AUC among the 7 methods on all 4 datasets. Finally, we validated a few top predicted DTIs through mining independent drug databases and literatures. In conclusion, PUDTI provides an effective pre-filtering method for new drug design.Lihong PengWen ZhuBo LiaoYu DuanMin ChenYi ChenJialiang YangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Lihong Peng Wen Zhu Bo Liao Yu Duan Min Chen Yi Chen Jialiang Yang Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
description |
Abstract Identifying drug-target interaction (DTI) candidates is crucial for drug repositioning. However, usually only positive DTIs are deposited in known databases, which challenges computational methods to predict novel DTIs due to the lack of negative samples. To overcome this dilemma, researchers usually randomly select negative samples from unlabeled drug-target pairs, which introduces a lot of false-positives. In this study, a negative sample extraction method named NDTISE is first developed to screen strong negative DTI examples based on positive-unlabeled learning. A novel DTI screening framework, PUDTI, is then designed to infer new drug repositioning candidates by integrating NDTISE, probabilities that remaining ambiguous samples belong to the positive and negative classes, and an SVM-based optimization model. We investigated the effectiveness of NDTISE on a DTI data provided by NCPIS. NDTISE is much better than random selection and slightly outperforms NCPIS. We then compared PUDTI with 6 state-of-the-art methods on 4 classes of DTI datasets from human enzymes, ion channels, GPCRs and nuclear receptors. PUDTI achieved the highest AUC among the 7 methods on all 4 datasets. Finally, we validated a few top predicted DTIs through mining independent drug databases and literatures. In conclusion, PUDTI provides an effective pre-filtering method for new drug design. |
format |
article |
author |
Lihong Peng Wen Zhu Bo Liao Yu Duan Min Chen Yi Chen Jialiang Yang |
author_facet |
Lihong Peng Wen Zhu Bo Liao Yu Duan Min Chen Yi Chen Jialiang Yang |
author_sort |
Lihong Peng |
title |
Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
title_short |
Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
title_full |
Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
title_fullStr |
Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
title_sort |
screening drug-target interactions with positive-unlabeled learning |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/656e1bfed72c43d39dedc4ea57292f76 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lihongpeng screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT wenzhu screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT boliao screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT yuduan screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT minchen screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT yichen screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning AT jialiangyang screeningdrugtargetinteractionswithpositiveunlabeledlearning |
_version_ |
1718395646223843328 |