Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.

<h4>Rationale</h4>Recent studies have discovered several unique tumor response subgroups outside of response classification by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), such as mixed response and oligometastasis. These subtypes have a distinctive property, lesion heterogene...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dung-Tsa Chen, Wenyaw Chan, Zachary J Thompson, Ram Thapa, Amer A Beg, Andreas N Saltos, Alberto A Chiappori, Jhanelle E Gray, Eric B Haura, Trevor A Rose, Ben Creelan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/659848f0970b4b5e8a041e80db5248b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:659848f0970b4b5e8a041e80db5248b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:659848f0970b4b5e8a041e80db5248b82021-12-02T20:05:15ZUtilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252041https://doaj.org/article/659848f0970b4b5e8a041e80db5248b82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252041https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Rationale</h4>Recent studies have discovered several unique tumor response subgroups outside of response classification by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), such as mixed response and oligometastasis. These subtypes have a distinctive property, lesion heterogeneity defined as diversity of tumor growth profiles in RECIST target lesions. Furthermore, many cancer clinical trials have been activated to evaluate various treatment options for heterogeneity-related subgroups (e.g., 29 trials so far listed in clinicaltrials.gov for cancer patients with oligometastasis). Some of the trials have shown survival benefit by tailored treatment strategies. This evidence presents the unmet need to incorporate lesion heterogeneity to improve RECIST response classification.<h4>Method</h4>An approach for Lesion Heterogeneity Classification (LeHeC) was developed using a contemporary statistical approach to assess target lesion variation, characterize patient treatment response, and translate informative evidence to improving treatment strategy. A mixed effect linear model was used to determine lesion heterogeneity. Further analysis was conducted to classify various types of lesion variation and incorporate with RECIST to enhance response classification. A study cohort of 110 target lesions from 36 lung cancer patients was used for evaluation.<h4>Results</h4>Due to small sample size issue, the result was exploratory in nature. By analyzing RECIST target lesion data, the LeHeC approach detected a high prevalence (n = 21; 58%) of lesion heterogeneity. Subgroup classification revealed several informative distinct subsets in a descending order of lesion heterogeneity: mix of progression and regression (n = 7), mix of progression and stability (n = 9), mix of regression and stability (n = 5), and non-heterogeneity (n = 15). Evaluation for association of lesion heterogeneity and RECIST best response classification showed lesion heterogeneity commonly occurred in each response group (stable disease: 16/27; 59%; partial response: 3/5; 60%; progression disease: 2/4; 50%). Survival analysis showed a differential trend of overall survival between heterogeneity and non-heterogeneity in RECIST response groups.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This is the first study to evaluate lesion heterogeneity, an underappreciated metric, for RECIST application in oncology clinical trials. Results indicated lesion heterogeneity is not an uncommon event. The LeHeC approach could enhance RECIST response classification by utilizing granular lesion level discovery of heterogeneity.Dung-Tsa ChenWenyaw ChanZachary J ThompsonRam ThapaAmer A BegAndreas N SaltosAlberto A ChiapporiJhanelle E GrayEric B HauraTrevor A RoseBen CreelanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0252041 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Dung-Tsa Chen
Wenyaw Chan
Zachary J Thompson
Ram Thapa
Amer A Beg
Andreas N Saltos
Alberto A Chiappori
Jhanelle E Gray
Eric B Haura
Trevor A Rose
Ben Creelan
Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
description <h4>Rationale</h4>Recent studies have discovered several unique tumor response subgroups outside of response classification by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), such as mixed response and oligometastasis. These subtypes have a distinctive property, lesion heterogeneity defined as diversity of tumor growth profiles in RECIST target lesions. Furthermore, many cancer clinical trials have been activated to evaluate various treatment options for heterogeneity-related subgroups (e.g., 29 trials so far listed in clinicaltrials.gov for cancer patients with oligometastasis). Some of the trials have shown survival benefit by tailored treatment strategies. This evidence presents the unmet need to incorporate lesion heterogeneity to improve RECIST response classification.<h4>Method</h4>An approach for Lesion Heterogeneity Classification (LeHeC) was developed using a contemporary statistical approach to assess target lesion variation, characterize patient treatment response, and translate informative evidence to improving treatment strategy. A mixed effect linear model was used to determine lesion heterogeneity. Further analysis was conducted to classify various types of lesion variation and incorporate with RECIST to enhance response classification. A study cohort of 110 target lesions from 36 lung cancer patients was used for evaluation.<h4>Results</h4>Due to small sample size issue, the result was exploratory in nature. By analyzing RECIST target lesion data, the LeHeC approach detected a high prevalence (n = 21; 58%) of lesion heterogeneity. Subgroup classification revealed several informative distinct subsets in a descending order of lesion heterogeneity: mix of progression and regression (n = 7), mix of progression and stability (n = 9), mix of regression and stability (n = 5), and non-heterogeneity (n = 15). Evaluation for association of lesion heterogeneity and RECIST best response classification showed lesion heterogeneity commonly occurred in each response group (stable disease: 16/27; 59%; partial response: 3/5; 60%; progression disease: 2/4; 50%). Survival analysis showed a differential trend of overall survival between heterogeneity and non-heterogeneity in RECIST response groups.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This is the first study to evaluate lesion heterogeneity, an underappreciated metric, for RECIST application in oncology clinical trials. Results indicated lesion heterogeneity is not an uncommon event. The LeHeC approach could enhance RECIST response classification by utilizing granular lesion level discovery of heterogeneity.
format article
author Dung-Tsa Chen
Wenyaw Chan
Zachary J Thompson
Ram Thapa
Amer A Beg
Andreas N Saltos
Alberto A Chiappori
Jhanelle E Gray
Eric B Haura
Trevor A Rose
Ben Creelan
author_facet Dung-Tsa Chen
Wenyaw Chan
Zachary J Thompson
Ram Thapa
Amer A Beg
Andreas N Saltos
Alberto A Chiappori
Jhanelle E Gray
Eric B Haura
Trevor A Rose
Ben Creelan
author_sort Dung-Tsa Chen
title Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
title_short Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
title_full Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
title_fullStr Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
title_sort utilization of target lesion heterogeneity for treatment efficacy assessment in late stage lung cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/659848f0970b4b5e8a041e80db5248b8
work_keys_str_mv AT dungtsachen utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT wenyawchan utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT zacharyjthompson utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT ramthapa utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT amerabeg utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT andreasnsaltos utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT albertoachiappori utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT jhanelleegray utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT ericbhaura utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT trevorarose utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
AT bencreelan utilizationoftargetlesionheterogeneityfortreatmentefficacyassessmentinlatestagelungcancer
_version_ 1718375486756749312