Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China

Abstract Computer-based testing (CBT), which refers to delivering assessments with computers, has been widely used in large English proficiency tests worldwide. Despite an increasing CBT in China, limited research is available concerning whether CBT can be used for the Test for English Majors-Band 4...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenjing Yu, Noriko Iwashita
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
P
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/65afaaa1ffbb40a2af4bb5f423fbb8fe
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:65afaaa1ffbb40a2af4bb5f423fbb8fe
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:65afaaa1ffbb40a2af4bb5f423fbb8fe2021-11-28T12:22:09ZComparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China10.1186/s40468-021-00147-02229-0443https://doaj.org/article/65afaaa1ffbb40a2af4bb5f423fbb8fe2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00147-0https://doaj.org/toc/2229-0443Abstract Computer-based testing (CBT), which refers to delivering assessments with computers, has been widely used in large English proficiency tests worldwide. Despite an increasing CBT in China, limited research is available concerning whether CBT can be used for the Test for English Majors-Band 4 (TEM 4). The current study investigated whether testing mode impacted TEM 4 score and factors (i.e., computer familiarity level and attitude towards CBT) that might correlate with performance on CBT of TEM 4. Overall 92 Chinese undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of the groups, i.e., CBT or paper-based testing (PBT), and took the test. A mixed method was employed, including (1) quantitative and qualitative analysis of test performance in two modes, as well as CBT group participants’ computer familiarity and attitudes towards the mode; and (2) thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. The results revealed that (1) test scores in CBT and PBT were comparable; (2) two items in the computer familiarity questionnaire, i.e., comfort level of reading articles on the computer and forgetting time when using computers, positively correlated with CBT scores; and (3) participants’ attitude towards CBT did not impact test performance.Wenjing YuNoriko IwashitaSpringerOpenarticleComputer-based testingPaper-based testingTest performanceScore equivalenceComputer familiarityTest takers’ attitudeLanguage and LiteraturePENLanguage Testing in Asia, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-21 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Computer-based testing
Paper-based testing
Test performance
Score equivalence
Computer familiarity
Test takers’ attitude
Language and Literature
P
spellingShingle Computer-based testing
Paper-based testing
Test performance
Score equivalence
Computer familiarity
Test takers’ attitude
Language and Literature
P
Wenjing Yu
Noriko Iwashita
Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
description Abstract Computer-based testing (CBT), which refers to delivering assessments with computers, has been widely used in large English proficiency tests worldwide. Despite an increasing CBT in China, limited research is available concerning whether CBT can be used for the Test for English Majors-Band 4 (TEM 4). The current study investigated whether testing mode impacted TEM 4 score and factors (i.e., computer familiarity level and attitude towards CBT) that might correlate with performance on CBT of TEM 4. Overall 92 Chinese undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of the groups, i.e., CBT or paper-based testing (PBT), and took the test. A mixed method was employed, including (1) quantitative and qualitative analysis of test performance in two modes, as well as CBT group participants’ computer familiarity and attitudes towards the mode; and (2) thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. The results revealed that (1) test scores in CBT and PBT were comparable; (2) two items in the computer familiarity questionnaire, i.e., comfort level of reading articles on the computer and forgetting time when using computers, positively correlated with CBT scores; and (3) participants’ attitude towards CBT did not impact test performance.
format article
author Wenjing Yu
Noriko Iwashita
author_facet Wenjing Yu
Noriko Iwashita
author_sort Wenjing Yu
title Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
title_short Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
title_full Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
title_fullStr Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China
title_sort comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (pbt) and computer-based testing (cbt) by english-majored undergraduate students in china
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/65afaaa1ffbb40a2af4bb5f423fbb8fe
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjingyu comparisonoftestperformanceonpaperbasedtestingpbtandcomputerbasedtestingcbtbyenglishmajoredundergraduatestudentsinchina
AT norikoiwashita comparisonoftestperformanceonpaperbasedtestingpbtandcomputerbasedtestingcbtbyenglishmajoredundergraduatestudentsinchina
_version_ 1718408019638747136