Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences

Maria Łoboz-Rudnicka,1 Joanna Jaroch,1 Zbigniew Bociąga,1 Barbara Rzyczkowska,1 Izabella Uchmanowicz,2 Jacek Polański,3 Krzysztof Dudek,4 Andrzej Szuba,5 Krystyna Łoboz-Grudzień2   1Department of Cardiology, T. Marciniak Hospital, 2Public Health Department, Wroclaw Medical Universi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łoboz-Rudnicka M, Jaroch J, Bociąga Z, Rzyczkowska B, Uchmanowicz I, Polański J, Dudek K, Szuba A, Łoboz-Grudzień K
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/65bf5f85eb8a491e958d68ef4af8e188
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:65bf5f85eb8a491e958d68ef4af8e188
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:65bf5f85eb8a491e958d68ef4af8e1882021-12-02T07:48:50ZImpact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/65bf5f85eb8a491e958d68ef4af8e1882016-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/impact-of-cardiovascular-risk-factors-on-carotid-intimandashmedia-thic-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Maria Łoboz-Rudnicka,1 Joanna Jaroch,1 Zbigniew Bociąga,1 Barbara Rzyczkowska,1 Izabella Uchmanowicz,2 Jacek Polański,3 Krzysztof Dudek,4 Andrzej Szuba,5 Krystyna Łoboz-Grudzień2   1Department of Cardiology, T. Marciniak Hospital, 2Public Health Department, Wroclaw Medical University, 3Private Practice, Na Biskupinie, Wroclaw, 4Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Technology, 5Division of Angiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland Background and purpose: There has been growing interest in the sex-related differences in the impact of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT). Therefore, we aimed at examining the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women and identifying differences between males and females in the risk profiles affecting CIMT. Patients and methods: The study group consisted of 256 patients (mean age 54.7 years), including 134 females (52%), with the following CV risk factors: arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, nicotine addiction, overweight, and obesity. Subjects with the history of any overt CV disease were excluded. CIMT was measured through B-mode ultrasound examination of the right common carotid artery. In the analysis of CIMT values at different ages, the patients were divided into three age groups: 1) <45 years, 2) 45–60 years, and 3) >60 years. Regression analysis was used to examine the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women. Results: CIMT increased with age in both men and women. Women had lower values of CIMT than men (0.54 mm vs 0.60 mm, P=0.011). The analysis in three age subgroups revealed that CIMT values were comparable in men and women in group 1 (0.48 mm vs 0.48 mm, P=0.861), but over the age of 45 years, CIMT values became significantly lower in women compared to men (group 2: 0.51 mm vs 0.63 mm, P=0.005; group 3: 0.63 mm vs 0.72 mm, P=0.020). Significant differences were observed between the sexes in terms of risk factor impact on CIMT. In men, only three factors significantly affected CIMT: age (b=+0.009, P<0.0001), hypertension (b=+0.067, P<0.05), and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.073, P<0.05). In women, apart from age (b=+0.008, P<0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.111, P<0.01), significant factors were pulse pressure (PP; b=+0.005, P<0.0001), body mass index (b=+0.007, P<0.05), increased waist circumference (b=+0.092, P<0.01), and metabolic syndrome (b=+0.071, P<0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, independent CIMT determinants for the entire group were age (β=0.497, P<0.001) and body mass index (β=0.195, P=0.006). For males, age was the only independent determinant of CIMT (β=0.669, P<0.001). For females, these were PP (β=0.317, P=0.014), age (β=0.242, P=0.03), and increased waist circumference (β=0.207, P=0.048). Conclusion: CIMT values are lower in women than in men, which is most pronounced over the age of 45 years. There are sex-related differences in the profile of CV risk factors affecting CIMT: in males, CIMT is mostly determined by age, while in females, by age, PP, and increased waist circumference. Keywords: carotid intima media thickness, risk factors, sex differencesŁoboz-Rudnicka MJaroch JBociąga ZRzyczkowska BUchmanowicz IPolański JDudek KSzuba AŁoboz-Grudzień KDove Medical Pressarticleintima media thicknessCVD risk factorsGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 11, Pp 721-731 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic intima media thickness
CVD risk factors
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle intima media thickness
CVD risk factors
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Łoboz-Rudnicka M
Jaroch J
Bociąga Z
Rzyczkowska B
Uchmanowicz I
Polański J
Dudek K
Szuba A
Łoboz-Grudzień K
Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
description Maria Łoboz-Rudnicka,1 Joanna Jaroch,1 Zbigniew Bociąga,1 Barbara Rzyczkowska,1 Izabella Uchmanowicz,2 Jacek Polański,3 Krzysztof Dudek,4 Andrzej Szuba,5 Krystyna Łoboz-Grudzień2   1Department of Cardiology, T. Marciniak Hospital, 2Public Health Department, Wroclaw Medical University, 3Private Practice, Na Biskupinie, Wroclaw, 4Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Technology, 5Division of Angiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland Background and purpose: There has been growing interest in the sex-related differences in the impact of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT). Therefore, we aimed at examining the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women and identifying differences between males and females in the risk profiles affecting CIMT. Patients and methods: The study group consisted of 256 patients (mean age 54.7 years), including 134 females (52%), with the following CV risk factors: arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, nicotine addiction, overweight, and obesity. Subjects with the history of any overt CV disease were excluded. CIMT was measured through B-mode ultrasound examination of the right common carotid artery. In the analysis of CIMT values at different ages, the patients were divided into three age groups: 1) <45 years, 2) 45–60 years, and 3) >60 years. Regression analysis was used to examine the influence of CV risk factors on CIMT in men and women. Results: CIMT increased with age in both men and women. Women had lower values of CIMT than men (0.54 mm vs 0.60 mm, P=0.011). The analysis in three age subgroups revealed that CIMT values were comparable in men and women in group 1 (0.48 mm vs 0.48 mm, P=0.861), but over the age of 45 years, CIMT values became significantly lower in women compared to men (group 2: 0.51 mm vs 0.63 mm, P=0.005; group 3: 0.63 mm vs 0.72 mm, P=0.020). Significant differences were observed between the sexes in terms of risk factor impact on CIMT. In men, only three factors significantly affected CIMT: age (b=+0.009, P<0.0001), hypertension (b=+0.067, P<0.05), and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.073, P<0.05). In women, apart from age (b=+0.008, P<0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (b=+0.111, P<0.01), significant factors were pulse pressure (PP; b=+0.005, P<0.0001), body mass index (b=+0.007, P<0.05), increased waist circumference (b=+0.092, P<0.01), and metabolic syndrome (b=+0.071, P<0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, independent CIMT determinants for the entire group were age (β=0.497, P<0.001) and body mass index (β=0.195, P=0.006). For males, age was the only independent determinant of CIMT (β=0.669, P<0.001). For females, these were PP (β=0.317, P=0.014), age (β=0.242, P=0.03), and increased waist circumference (β=0.207, P=0.048). Conclusion: CIMT values are lower in women than in men, which is most pronounced over the age of 45 years. There are sex-related differences in the profile of CV risk factors affecting CIMT: in males, CIMT is mostly determined by age, while in females, by age, PP, and increased waist circumference. Keywords: carotid intima media thickness, risk factors, sex differences
format article
author Łoboz-Rudnicka M
Jaroch J
Bociąga Z
Rzyczkowska B
Uchmanowicz I
Polański J
Dudek K
Szuba A
Łoboz-Grudzień K
author_facet Łoboz-Rudnicka M
Jaroch J
Bociąga Z
Rzyczkowska B
Uchmanowicz I
Polański J
Dudek K
Szuba A
Łoboz-Grudzień K
author_sort Łoboz-Rudnicka M
title Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
title_short Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
title_full Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
title_fullStr Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
title_full_unstemmed Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
title_sort impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima–media thickness: sex differences
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/65bf5f85eb8a491e958d68ef4af8e188
work_keys_str_mv AT łobozrudnickam impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT jarochj impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT bociagaz impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT rzyczkowskab impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT uchmanowiczi impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT polanskij impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT dudekk impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT szubaa impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
AT łobozgrudzienk impactofcardiovascularriskfactorsoncarotidintimandashmediathicknesssexdifferences
_version_ 1718399159133798400