The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review

Abstract Background The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Methods We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Libr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyungerel Byambasuren, Elaine Beller, Justin Clark, Peter Collignon, Paul Glasziou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/65eeeb870052425dbce04694c4670bf3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:65eeeb870052425dbce04694c4670bf3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:65eeeb870052425dbce04694c4670bf32021-11-08T11:14:23ZThe effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review10.1186/s13756-021-01025-32047-2994https://doaj.org/article/65eeeb870052425dbce04694c4670bf32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3https://doaj.org/toc/2047-2994Abstract Background The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Methods We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials and comparative observational studies in CENTRAL, and Europe PMC for pre-prints. We included studies that reported sufficient data to estimate the effect of any form of eye protection including face shields and variants, goggles, and glasses, on subsequent confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. Results We screened 898 articles and included 6 reports of 5 observational studies from 4 countries (USA, India, Columbia, and United Kingdom) that tested face shields, goggles, and wraparound eyewear on 7567 healthcare workers. The three before-and-after and one retrospective cohort studies showed statistically significant and substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections favouring eye protection with odds ratios ranging from 0.04 to 0.6, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 96% to 40%. These reductions were not explained by changes in the community rates. However, the one case–control study reported odds ratio favouring no eye protection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.99, 3.0). The high heterogeneity between studies precluded any meaningful meta-analysis. None of the studies adjusted for potential confounders such as other protective behaviours, thus increasing the risk of bias, and decreasing the certainty of evidence to very low. Conclusions Current studies suggest that eye protection may play a role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. However, robust comparative trials are needed to clearly determine effectiveness of eye protections and wearability issues in both healthcare and general populations.Oyungerel ByambasurenElaine BellerJustin ClarkPeter CollignonPaul GlasziouBMCarticleCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Eye protectionFace shieldInfection preventionInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Eye protection
Face shield
Infection prevention
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Eye protection
Face shield
Infection prevention
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Oyungerel Byambasuren
Elaine Beller
Justin Clark
Peter Collignon
Paul Glasziou
The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
description Abstract Background The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Methods We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials and comparative observational studies in CENTRAL, and Europe PMC for pre-prints. We included studies that reported sufficient data to estimate the effect of any form of eye protection including face shields and variants, goggles, and glasses, on subsequent confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. Results We screened 898 articles and included 6 reports of 5 observational studies from 4 countries (USA, India, Columbia, and United Kingdom) that tested face shields, goggles, and wraparound eyewear on 7567 healthcare workers. The three before-and-after and one retrospective cohort studies showed statistically significant and substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections favouring eye protection with odds ratios ranging from 0.04 to 0.6, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 96% to 40%. These reductions were not explained by changes in the community rates. However, the one case–control study reported odds ratio favouring no eye protection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.99, 3.0). The high heterogeneity between studies precluded any meaningful meta-analysis. None of the studies adjusted for potential confounders such as other protective behaviours, thus increasing the risk of bias, and decreasing the certainty of evidence to very low. Conclusions Current studies suggest that eye protection may play a role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. However, robust comparative trials are needed to clearly determine effectiveness of eye protections and wearability issues in both healthcare and general populations.
format article
author Oyungerel Byambasuren
Elaine Beller
Justin Clark
Peter Collignon
Paul Glasziou
author_facet Oyungerel Byambasuren
Elaine Beller
Justin Clark
Peter Collignon
Paul Glasziou
author_sort Oyungerel Byambasuren
title The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
title_short The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
title_full The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
title_sort effect of eye protection on sars-cov-2 transmission: a systematic review
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/65eeeb870052425dbce04694c4670bf3
work_keys_str_mv AT oyungerelbyambasuren theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT elainebeller theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT justinclark theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT petercollignon theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT paulglasziou theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT oyungerelbyambasuren effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT elainebeller effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT justinclark effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT petercollignon effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
AT paulglasziou effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview
_version_ 1718442339983163392