Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.

<h4>Background</h4>The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heleen A Slagter, Katerina Georgopoulou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/65f92a8ec1e44d9cb16907a38729adb1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:65f92a8ec1e44d9cb16907a38729adb1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:65f92a8ec1e44d9cb16907a38729adb12021-11-18T07:45:01ZDistractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0064681https://doaj.org/article/65f92a8ec1e44d9cb16907a38729adb12013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23705002/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine. Yet, it is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. Here, we examined whether distractor suppression ability is predictive of an individual's AB depth and/or recovery. In addition, we investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Subjects were presented with rapid streams of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. T2 was presented either at Lag2, Lag4 or Lag10, and preceded by a distractor that shared the same identity as T2 (T2 primed) or not (T2 not primed). Replicating previous work [1], we found that slow AB recovery (poor T2 performance in Lag4 vs. Lag10) was associated with a failure to inhibit distractors, as indexed by greater positive priming. However, no relationship was observed between a subject's ability to suppress distractors and AB depth (Lag10 vs. Lag2). Moreover, no relationship between sEBR and AB performance was observed.<h4>Results/significance</h4>These results indicate that a failure to inhibit distracting information impairs AB recovery, possibly by interfering with target encoding in working memory - but does not affect AB magnitude. The absence of a relationship between individual sEBR and AB performance may be explained by task specifics.Heleen A SlagterKaterina GeorgopoulouPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 5, p e64681 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Heleen A Slagter
Katerina Georgopoulou
Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
description <h4>Background</h4>The attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine. Yet, it is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. Here, we examined whether distractor suppression ability is predictive of an individual's AB depth and/or recovery. In addition, we investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Subjects were presented with rapid streams of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. T2 was presented either at Lag2, Lag4 or Lag10, and preceded by a distractor that shared the same identity as T2 (T2 primed) or not (T2 not primed). Replicating previous work [1], we found that slow AB recovery (poor T2 performance in Lag4 vs. Lag10) was associated with a failure to inhibit distractors, as indexed by greater positive priming. However, no relationship was observed between a subject's ability to suppress distractors and AB depth (Lag10 vs. Lag2). Moreover, no relationship between sEBR and AB performance was observed.<h4>Results/significance</h4>These results indicate that a failure to inhibit distracting information impairs AB recovery, possibly by interfering with target encoding in working memory - but does not affect AB magnitude. The absence of a relationship between individual sEBR and AB performance may be explained by task specifics.
format article
author Heleen A Slagter
Katerina Georgopoulou
author_facet Heleen A Slagter
Katerina Georgopoulou
author_sort Heleen A Slagter
title Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
title_short Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
title_full Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
title_fullStr Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
title_full_unstemmed Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
title_sort distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/65f92a8ec1e44d9cb16907a38729adb1
work_keys_str_mv AT heleenaslagter distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesinrecoveryfromtheattentionalblink
AT katerinageorgopoulou distractorinhibitionpredictsindividualdifferencesinrecoveryfromtheattentionalblink
_version_ 1718423040895746048