Contemporary Social Theory

Introduction Contemporary social theory is conventionally addresed from within the dominant tradition of inquiry. Rarely is it subject to a critical reflection from beyond its own ken. This is a pity, for the subject matter and scope of social theory go beyond the confines of any exclusive traditio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mona M. Abul-Fadl
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/662a1f621f534e2d8211eca216e07cee
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:662a1f621f534e2d8211eca216e07cee
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:662a1f621f534e2d8211eca216e07cee2021-12-02T19:22:43ZContemporary Social Theory10.35632/ajis.v11i3.24142690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/662a1f621f534e2d8211eca216e07cee1994-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2414https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Introduction Contemporary social theory is conventionally addresed from within the dominant tradition of inquiry. Rarely is it subject to a critical reflection from beyond its own ken. This is a pity, for the subject matter and scope of social theory go beyond the confines of any exclusive tradition, while its reach and influence in the global context of our times merely reinforce its extended compass. Given the fact that the ambitious claims made by social theorists about the univetsality of their project are hardly borne out by the reality, any pretensions at exclusivism or hegemony would be as anachronistic as they are morally reprehensible. The gap between the legitimate ambitions for a universally relevant social theory and the mdity of a field grounded in its historical coflstral.l lt sand cultural prejudices can be filled only by a critical and constructive initiative taken from within the profession to constitute a candid, open, and reflexive self-encounter. The opportuneness for such an initiative is enhanced by its urgency: the discrepancies that follow on the ineptitude of our social knowledge can only raise doubts about the relevance of our science to our social condition. In deploring the tesulting ineptitude and irrelevance, it is possible to do so in the voice of a genemlized subject, the universal "I," for surely this is one of the ateas of convergence where scholats from different traditions could agree. The measure of this agreement can only be gauged by remembering that "a science for the study of society" originally went beyond its grounding in scientific reason to its justification in a moral reasoning. And here, regardless of the grounding of that morality, we find another significant area of convergence for scholars working in different ... Mona M. Abul-FadlInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 11, Iss 3 (1994)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Mona M. Abul-Fadl
Contemporary Social Theory
description Introduction Contemporary social theory is conventionally addresed from within the dominant tradition of inquiry. Rarely is it subject to a critical reflection from beyond its own ken. This is a pity, for the subject matter and scope of social theory go beyond the confines of any exclusive tradition, while its reach and influence in the global context of our times merely reinforce its extended compass. Given the fact that the ambitious claims made by social theorists about the univetsality of their project are hardly borne out by the reality, any pretensions at exclusivism or hegemony would be as anachronistic as they are morally reprehensible. The gap between the legitimate ambitions for a universally relevant social theory and the mdity of a field grounded in its historical coflstral.l lt sand cultural prejudices can be filled only by a critical and constructive initiative taken from within the profession to constitute a candid, open, and reflexive self-encounter. The opportuneness for such an initiative is enhanced by its urgency: the discrepancies that follow on the ineptitude of our social knowledge can only raise doubts about the relevance of our science to our social condition. In deploring the tesulting ineptitude and irrelevance, it is possible to do so in the voice of a genemlized subject, the universal "I," for surely this is one of the ateas of convergence where scholats from different traditions could agree. The measure of this agreement can only be gauged by remembering that "a science for the study of society" originally went beyond its grounding in scientific reason to its justification in a moral reasoning. And here, regardless of the grounding of that morality, we find another significant area of convergence for scholars working in different ...
format article
author Mona M. Abul-Fadl
author_facet Mona M. Abul-Fadl
author_sort Mona M. Abul-Fadl
title Contemporary Social Theory
title_short Contemporary Social Theory
title_full Contemporary Social Theory
title_fullStr Contemporary Social Theory
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary Social Theory
title_sort contemporary social theory
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1994
url https://doaj.org/article/662a1f621f534e2d8211eca216e07cee
work_keys_str_mv AT monamabulfadl contemporarysocialtheory
_version_ 1718376681342763008