Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education

Undergraduate training continues to be a challenge to train entrepreneurial specialists with research-oriented attitudes. Depending on the level of func-tional development of the brain, the level of learning will be different in re-lation to chronological age. The ACRA learning strategies scales (Ro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ynés Phun-Pat, Carmen Chauca, Maritza Elizabeth Arones Mayurí, Olga Maria Curro-Urbano
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Kassel University Press 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/669237edda964b3490faea3f6eda78b7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:669237edda964b3490faea3f6eda78b7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:669237edda964b3490faea3f6eda78b72021-12-02T19:40:51ZCognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education1863-038310.3991/ijet.v16i20.25167https://doaj.org/article/669237edda964b3490faea3f6eda78b72021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/25167https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383Undergraduate training continues to be a challenge to train entrepreneurial specialists with research-oriented attitudes. Depending on the level of func-tional development of the brain, the level of learning will be different in re-lation to chronological age. The ACRA learning strategies scales (Román & Gallego, 2001) allow verifying the frequency, type of strategy and specific technique used by students, the coding strategies being the most important for effective performance throughout life; although there is an abbreviated and validated version of this scale applicable only at the university level by De la Fuente and Justicia (2003); In the study, the 2001 version of Román & Gallego is applied to analyze, according to age, the correspondence between the learning strategies used by the students with their academic performance, as well as to verify if there is a difference by gender, during a period of three years . Technical sheets and final grades of the students were also ap-plied; a multiple linear regression analysis; it is a mixed type investigation. It is observed that the Coding strategies are not used very frequently. In Aca-demic Performance (AR), only 7.85% of the students obtained a final score of 14 or more, the use score coinciding with scales that measure the same learning strategies. The type of strategies and the age (18-19 years) registered influence the RA and only the Acquisition strategies show a slight relation-ship with the RA. There is no gender relationship.Ynés Phun-PatCarmen ChaucaMaritza Elizabeth Arones MayuríOlga Maria Curro-UrbanoKassel University Pressarticleacraadolescencebrain developmenteffective learningeffectivenessEducationLInformation technologyT58.5-58.64ENInternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), Vol 16, Iss 20, Pp 35-50 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic acra
adolescence
brain development
effective learning
effectiveness
Education
L
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
spellingShingle acra
adolescence
brain development
effective learning
effectiveness
Education
L
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Ynés Phun-Pat
Carmen Chauca
Maritza Elizabeth Arones Mayurí
Olga Maria Curro-Urbano
Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
description Undergraduate training continues to be a challenge to train entrepreneurial specialists with research-oriented attitudes. Depending on the level of func-tional development of the brain, the level of learning will be different in re-lation to chronological age. The ACRA learning strategies scales (Román & Gallego, 2001) allow verifying the frequency, type of strategy and specific technique used by students, the coding strategies being the most important for effective performance throughout life; although there is an abbreviated and validated version of this scale applicable only at the university level by De la Fuente and Justicia (2003); In the study, the 2001 version of Román & Gallego is applied to analyze, according to age, the correspondence between the learning strategies used by the students with their academic performance, as well as to verify if there is a difference by gender, during a period of three years . Technical sheets and final grades of the students were also ap-plied; a multiple linear regression analysis; it is a mixed type investigation. It is observed that the Coding strategies are not used very frequently. In Aca-demic Performance (AR), only 7.85% of the students obtained a final score of 14 or more, the use score coinciding with scales that measure the same learning strategies. The type of strategies and the age (18-19 years) registered influence the RA and only the Acquisition strategies show a slight relation-ship with the RA. There is no gender relationship.
format article
author Ynés Phun-Pat
Carmen Chauca
Maritza Elizabeth Arones Mayurí
Olga Maria Curro-Urbano
author_facet Ynés Phun-Pat
Carmen Chauca
Maritza Elizabeth Arones Mayurí
Olga Maria Curro-Urbano
author_sort Ynés Phun-Pat
title Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
title_short Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
title_full Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
title_fullStr Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Development, Learning Strategies and Academic Performance in The First Stage of University Education
title_sort cognitive development, learning strategies and academic performance in the first stage of university education
publisher Kassel University Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/669237edda964b3490faea3f6eda78b7
work_keys_str_mv AT ynesphunpat cognitivedevelopmentlearningstrategiesandacademicperformanceinthefirststageofuniversityeducation
AT carmenchauca cognitivedevelopmentlearningstrategiesandacademicperformanceinthefirststageofuniversityeducation
AT maritzaelizabetharonesmayuri cognitivedevelopmentlearningstrategiesandacademicperformanceinthefirststageofuniversityeducation
AT olgamariacurrourbano cognitivedevelopmentlearningstrategiesandacademicperformanceinthefirststageofuniversityeducation
_version_ 1718376206240317440