Preoperative estimate of natural ureteral length based on computed tomography and/or plain radiography
Abstract To predict natural ureter lengths based on clinical images. We reviewed our image database of patients who underwent multiphasic computed tomography urography from January 2019 to April 2020. Natural ureteral length (ULCTU) was measured using a three-dimensional curved multiplanar reformati...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/669f013b44e74e0c9752610ddc1a5539 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Abstract To predict natural ureter lengths based on clinical images. We reviewed our image database of patients who underwent multiphasic computed tomography urography from January 2019 to April 2020. Natural ureteral length (ULCTU) was measured using a three-dimensional curved multiplanar reformation technique. Patient parameters including age, height, and height of the lumbar spine, the index of ureteral length using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs (C-P and C-PS) and computed tomography (ULCT) were collected. ULCTU correlated most strongly with ULCT. R square and adjusted R square values from multivariate regression were 0.686 and 0.678 (left side) and 0.516 and 0.503 (right side), respectively. ULCTU could be estimated by the regression model in three different scenarios as follows: ULCT + C-P ULCTUL = 0.405 $$\times$$ × ULCTL $$+$$ + 0.626 $$\times$$ × C-PL – 0.508 cm ULCTUR = 0.558 $$\times$$ × ULCTR $$+$$ + 0.218 $$\times$$ × C-PR + 6.533 cm ULCT ULCTUL = 0.876 $$\times$$ × ULCTL $$+$$ + 6.337 cm ULCTUR = 0.710 $$\times$$ × ULCTR $$+$$ + 9.625 cm C-P ULCTUL = 0.678 $$\times$$ × C-PL $$+$$ + 4.836 cm ULCTUR = 0.495 $$\times$$ × C-PR $$+$$ + 10.353 cm We provide equations to predict ULCTU based on CT, KUB or CT plus KUB for different clinical scenarios. The formula based on CT plus KUB provided the most accurate estimation, while the others had lower validation values but could still meet clinical needs. |
|---|