Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study

Objective: To compare outcomes of the Mathieu incised-plate (Mathieu-IP) technique vs the standard tubularised incised-plate (TIP) technique for primary management of distal hypospadias. Patients and methods: Between April 2012 and August 2015, 66 patients (aged 15–60 months) with primary distal hyp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostafa Khalil, Tarek Gharib, Waleed El-shaer, Ahmed Sebaey, Basheer Elmohamady, Khalid Elgamal
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/66ad2d0935ec456bb6eaec4328c9d32e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:66ad2d0935ec456bb6eaec4328c9d32e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:66ad2d0935ec456bb6eaec4328c9d32e2021-12-02T10:23:50ZMathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study2090-598X10.1016/j.aju.2017.03.007https://doaj.org/article/66ad2d0935ec456bb6eaec4328c9d32e2017-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090598X17300438https://doaj.org/toc/2090-598XObjective: To compare outcomes of the Mathieu incised-plate (Mathieu-IP) technique vs the standard tubularised incised-plate (TIP) technique for primary management of distal hypospadias. Patients and methods: Between April 2012 and August 2015, 66 patients (aged 15–60 months) with primary distal hypospadias were randomly allocated to two groups. Group 1 included 34 patients who underwent Mathieu-IP repair and Group 2 included 32 patients managed using the TIP technique for primary management of distal hypospadias. Postoperatively, all patients were examined weekly up to 1 month and then at 3 and 6 months. Perioperative data, complications and outcomes of both procedures were statistically analysed and compared. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics between the groups at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (SD) operative time between Groups 1 and 2, at 95 (7.6) and 91.2 (8.1) min, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the shape of the urine stream at micturition or the neomeatus between the groups postoperatively. The rate of postoperative fistula was significantly higher in Group 2 (TIP) compared to Group 1 (Mathieu-IP), at 18.7% vs 2.9% (P = 0.004). There was no postoperative meatal stenosis in Group 1, which did occur in five patients (15.6%) in Group 2 (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The Mathieu-IP technique appeared to be better than the standard TIP technique with regard to postoperative fistula formation and meatal stenosis, and with acceptable cosmesis.Mostafa KhalilTarek GharibWaleed El-shaerAhmed SebaeyBasheer ElmohamadyKhalid ElgamalTaylor & Francis GrouparticleMathieuTubularisedIncised-plate distalHypospadiasDiseases of the genitourinary system. UrologyRC870-923ENArab Journal of Urology, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 242-247 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Mathieu
Tubularised
Incised-plate distal
Hypospadias
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
RC870-923
spellingShingle Mathieu
Tubularised
Incised-plate distal
Hypospadias
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
RC870-923
Mostafa Khalil
Tarek Gharib
Waleed El-shaer
Ahmed Sebaey
Basheer Elmohamady
Khalid Elgamal
Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
description Objective: To compare outcomes of the Mathieu incised-plate (Mathieu-IP) technique vs the standard tubularised incised-plate (TIP) technique for primary management of distal hypospadias. Patients and methods: Between April 2012 and August 2015, 66 patients (aged 15–60 months) with primary distal hypospadias were randomly allocated to two groups. Group 1 included 34 patients who underwent Mathieu-IP repair and Group 2 included 32 patients managed using the TIP technique for primary management of distal hypospadias. Postoperatively, all patients were examined weekly up to 1 month and then at 3 and 6 months. Perioperative data, complications and outcomes of both procedures were statistically analysed and compared. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics between the groups at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (SD) operative time between Groups 1 and 2, at 95 (7.6) and 91.2 (8.1) min, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the shape of the urine stream at micturition or the neomeatus between the groups postoperatively. The rate of postoperative fistula was significantly higher in Group 2 (TIP) compared to Group 1 (Mathieu-IP), at 18.7% vs 2.9% (P = 0.004). There was no postoperative meatal stenosis in Group 1, which did occur in five patients (15.6%) in Group 2 (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The Mathieu-IP technique appeared to be better than the standard TIP technique with regard to postoperative fistula formation and meatal stenosis, and with acceptable cosmesis.
format article
author Mostafa Khalil
Tarek Gharib
Waleed El-shaer
Ahmed Sebaey
Basheer Elmohamady
Khalid Elgamal
author_facet Mostafa Khalil
Tarek Gharib
Waleed El-shaer
Ahmed Sebaey
Basheer Elmohamady
Khalid Elgamal
author_sort Mostafa Khalil
title Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
title_short Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
title_full Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study
title_sort mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: a prospective randomised study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/66ad2d0935ec456bb6eaec4328c9d32e
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafakhalil mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT tarekgharib mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT waleedelshaer mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT ahmedsebaey mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT basheerelmohamady mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT khalidelgamal mathieutechniquewithincisionoftheurethralplateversusstandardtubularisedincisedplateurethroplastyinprimaryrepairofdistalhypospadiasaprospectiverandomisedstudy
_version_ 1718397288305393664