Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

Coronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao-Fei Gao, Xiang-Quan Kong, Guang-Feng Zuo, Zhi-Mei Wang, Zhen Ge, Jun-Jie Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Radcliffe Medical Media 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b2021-12-04T16:02:45ZIntravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials10.15420/usc.2020.031758-390X1758-3896https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b2020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2020.03https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3896https://doaj.org/toc/1758-390XCoronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number of limitations of coronary angiography by providing more information about the dimensions of the vessel lumen, plaque characteristics, stent deployment, and the mechanisms of device failure. Growing data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials have confirmed the clinical benefit of IVUS guidance during PCI. This article summarizes the evidence regarding IVUS guidance to highlight its advantages and to support the use of IVUS during PCI.Xiao-Fei GaoXiang-Quan KongGuang-Feng ZuoZhi-Mei WangZhen GeJun-Jie ZhangRadcliffe Medical MediaarticleDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENUS Cardiology Review , Vol 14, Iss , Pp - (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Xiao-Fei Gao
Xiang-Quan Kong
Guang-Feng Zuo
Zhi-Mei Wang
Zhen Ge
Jun-Jie Zhang
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
description Coronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number of limitations of coronary angiography by providing more information about the dimensions of the vessel lumen, plaque characteristics, stent deployment, and the mechanisms of device failure. Growing data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials have confirmed the clinical benefit of IVUS guidance during PCI. This article summarizes the evidence regarding IVUS guidance to highlight its advantages and to support the use of IVUS during PCI.
format article
author Xiao-Fei Gao
Xiang-Quan Kong
Guang-Feng Zuo
Zhi-Mei Wang
Zhen Ge
Jun-Jie Zhang
author_facet Xiao-Fei Gao
Xiang-Quan Kong
Guang-Feng Zuo
Zhi-Mei Wang
Zhen Ge
Jun-Jie Zhang
author_sort Xiao-Fei Gao
title Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials
publisher Radcliffe Medical Media
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaofeigao intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiangquankong intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guangfengzuo intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhimeiwang intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhenge intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT junjiezhang intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1718372739174105088