Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
Coronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Radcliffe Medical Media
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b2021-12-04T16:02:45ZIntravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials10.15420/usc.2020.031758-390X1758-3896https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b2020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2020.03https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3896https://doaj.org/toc/1758-390XCoronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number of limitations of coronary angiography by providing more information about the dimensions of the vessel lumen, plaque characteristics, stent deployment, and the mechanisms of device failure. Growing data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials have confirmed the clinical benefit of IVUS guidance during PCI. This article summarizes the evidence regarding IVUS guidance to highlight its advantages and to support the use of IVUS during PCI.Xiao-Fei GaoXiang-Quan KongGuang-Feng ZuoZhi-Mei WangZhen GeJun-Jie ZhangRadcliffe Medical MediaarticleDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENUS Cardiology Review , Vol 14, Iss , Pp - (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 |
spellingShingle |
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Xiao-Fei Gao Xiang-Quan Kong Guang-Feng Zuo Zhi-Mei Wang Zhen Ge Jun-Jie Zhang Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
description |
Coronary angiography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 2D-projection angiography cannot completely reflect the 3D coronary lumen. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome a number of limitations of coronary angiography by providing more information about the dimensions of the vessel lumen, plaque characteristics, stent deployment, and the mechanisms of device failure. Growing data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials have confirmed the clinical benefit of IVUS guidance during PCI. This article summarizes the evidence regarding IVUS guidance to highlight its advantages and to support the use of IVUS during PCI. |
format |
article |
author |
Xiao-Fei Gao Xiang-Quan Kong Guang-Feng Zuo Zhi-Mei Wang Zhen Ge Jun-Jie Zhang |
author_facet |
Xiao-Fei Gao Xiang-Quan Kong Guang-Feng Zuo Zhi-Mei Wang Zhen Ge Jun-Jie Zhang |
author_sort |
Xiao-Fei Gao |
title |
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short |
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full |
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr |
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort |
intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
publisher |
Radcliffe Medical Media |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/66aec26815214c069678a6003e56061b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaofeigao intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiangquankong intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT guangfengzuo intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhimeiwang intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhenge intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT junjiezhang intravascularultrasoundguidedversusangiographyguidedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionevidencefromobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials |
_version_ |
1718372739174105088 |