Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase

Abstract One of the potential antibiofilm strategies is to use lytic phages and phage-derived polysaccharide depolymerases. The idea is to uncover bacteria embedded in the biofilm matrix making them accessible and vulnerable to antibacterials and the immune system. Here we present the antibiofilm ef...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agnieszka Latka, Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/674ae0865dc348a49e40ae0e8bc7ee2c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:674ae0865dc348a49e40ae0e8bc7ee2c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:674ae0865dc348a49e40ae0e8bc7ee2c2021-12-02T11:41:41ZAdvantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase10.1038/s41598-020-77198-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/674ae0865dc348a49e40ae0e8bc7ee2c2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77198-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract One of the potential antibiofilm strategies is to use lytic phages and phage-derived polysaccharide depolymerases. The idea is to uncover bacteria embedded in the biofilm matrix making them accessible and vulnerable to antibacterials and the immune system. Here we present the antibiofilm efficiency of lytic phage KP34 equipped with virion-associated capsule degrading enzyme (depolymerase) and its recombinant depolymerase KP34p57, depolymerase-non-bearing phage KP15, and ciprofloxacin, separately and in combination, using a multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae biofilm model. The most effective antibiofilm agents were (1) phage KP34 alone or in combination with ciprofloxacin/phage KP15, and (2) depolymerase KP34p57 with phage KP15 and ciprofloxacin. Secondly, applying the commonly used biofilm microtiter assays: (1) colony count, (2) LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit, and (3) crystal violet (CV) biofilm staining, we unravelled the main advantages and limitations of the above methods in antibiofilm testing. The diverse mode of action of selected antimicrobials strongly influenced obtained results, including a false positive enlargement of biofilm mass (CV staining) while applying polysaccharide degrading agents. We suggest that to get a proper picture of antimicrobials’ effectiveness, multiple examination methods should be used and the results must be read considering the principle of each technique and the antibacterial mechanism.Agnieszka LatkaZuzanna Drulis-KawaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Agnieszka Latka
Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
description Abstract One of the potential antibiofilm strategies is to use lytic phages and phage-derived polysaccharide depolymerases. The idea is to uncover bacteria embedded in the biofilm matrix making them accessible and vulnerable to antibacterials and the immune system. Here we present the antibiofilm efficiency of lytic phage KP34 equipped with virion-associated capsule degrading enzyme (depolymerase) and its recombinant depolymerase KP34p57, depolymerase-non-bearing phage KP15, and ciprofloxacin, separately and in combination, using a multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae biofilm model. The most effective antibiofilm agents were (1) phage KP34 alone or in combination with ciprofloxacin/phage KP15, and (2) depolymerase KP34p57 with phage KP15 and ciprofloxacin. Secondly, applying the commonly used biofilm microtiter assays: (1) colony count, (2) LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit, and (3) crystal violet (CV) biofilm staining, we unravelled the main advantages and limitations of the above methods in antibiofilm testing. The diverse mode of action of selected antimicrobials strongly influenced obtained results, including a false positive enlargement of biofilm mass (CV staining) while applying polysaccharide degrading agents. We suggest that to get a proper picture of antimicrobials’ effectiveness, multiple examination methods should be used and the results must be read considering the principle of each technique and the antibacterial mechanism.
format article
author Agnieszka Latka
Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
author_facet Agnieszka Latka
Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
author_sort Agnieszka Latka
title Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
title_short Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
title_full Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
title_fullStr Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
title_full_unstemmed Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase
title_sort advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of klebsiella phage kp34 and its depolymerase
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/674ae0865dc348a49e40ae0e8bc7ee2c
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkalatka advantagesandlimitationsofmicrotiterbiofilmassaysinthemodelofantibiofilmactivityofklebsiellaphagekp34anditsdepolymerase
AT zuzannadruliskawa advantagesandlimitationsofmicrotiterbiofilmassaysinthemodelofantibiofilmactivityofklebsiellaphagekp34anditsdepolymerase
_version_ 1718395401226158080