Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment

Abstract Residential buildings can concentrate radioactive radon gas, exposing occupants to particle radiation that increases lung cancer risk. This has worsened over time in North America, with newer residences containing greater radon. Using data from 18,971 Canadian households, we calculated annu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Justin A. Simms, Dustin D. Pearson, Natasha L. Cholowsky, Jesse L. Irvine, Markus E. Nielsen, Weston R. Jacques, Joshua M. Taron, Cheryl E. Peters, Linda E. Carlson, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6779b23c6d46472a9d09de059351bd80
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6779b23c6d46472a9d09de059351bd80
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6779b23c6d46472a9d09de059351bd802021-12-02T14:02:55ZYounger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment10.1038/s41598-021-86096-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6779b23c6d46472a9d09de059351bd802021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86096-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Residential buildings can concentrate radioactive radon gas, exposing occupants to particle radiation that increases lung cancer risk. This has worsened over time in North America, with newer residences containing greater radon. Using data from 18,971 Canadian households, we calculated annual particle radiation dose rates due to long term residential radon exposure, and examined this as a function of occupant demographics. The current particle radiation dose rate to lungs from residential radon in Canada is 4.08 mSv/y from 108.2 Bq/m3, with 23.4% receiving 100–2655 mSv doses that are known to elevate human cancer risk. Notably, residences built in the twenty-first century are occupied by significantly younger people experiencing greater radiation dose rates from radon (mean age of 46 at 5.01 mSv/y), relative to older groups more likely to occupy twentieth century-built properties (mean age of 53 at 3.45–4.22 mSv/y). Newer, higher radon-containing properties are also more likely to have minors, pregnant women and an overall higher number of occupants living there full time. As younger age-of-exposure to radon equates to greater lifetime lung cancer risk, these data reveal a worst case scenario of exposure bias. This is of concern as, if it continues, it forecasts serious future increases in radon-induced lung cancer in younger people.Justin A. SimmsDustin D. PearsonNatasha L. CholowskyJesse L. IrvineMarkus E. NielsenWeston R. JacquesJoshua M. TaronCheryl E. PetersLinda E. CarlsonAaron A. GoodarziNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Justin A. Simms
Dustin D. Pearson
Natasha L. Cholowsky
Jesse L. Irvine
Markus E. Nielsen
Weston R. Jacques
Joshua M. Taron
Cheryl E. Peters
Linda E. Carlson
Aaron A. Goodarzi
Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
description Abstract Residential buildings can concentrate radioactive radon gas, exposing occupants to particle radiation that increases lung cancer risk. This has worsened over time in North America, with newer residences containing greater radon. Using data from 18,971 Canadian households, we calculated annual particle radiation dose rates due to long term residential radon exposure, and examined this as a function of occupant demographics. The current particle radiation dose rate to lungs from residential radon in Canada is 4.08 mSv/y from 108.2 Bq/m3, with 23.4% receiving 100–2655 mSv doses that are known to elevate human cancer risk. Notably, residences built in the twenty-first century are occupied by significantly younger people experiencing greater radiation dose rates from radon (mean age of 46 at 5.01 mSv/y), relative to older groups more likely to occupy twentieth century-built properties (mean age of 53 at 3.45–4.22 mSv/y). Newer, higher radon-containing properties are also more likely to have minors, pregnant women and an overall higher number of occupants living there full time. As younger age-of-exposure to radon equates to greater lifetime lung cancer risk, these data reveal a worst case scenario of exposure bias. This is of concern as, if it continues, it forecasts serious future increases in radon-induced lung cancer in younger people.
format article
author Justin A. Simms
Dustin D. Pearson
Natasha L. Cholowsky
Jesse L. Irvine
Markus E. Nielsen
Weston R. Jacques
Joshua M. Taron
Cheryl E. Peters
Linda E. Carlson
Aaron A. Goodarzi
author_facet Justin A. Simms
Dustin D. Pearson
Natasha L. Cholowsky
Jesse L. Irvine
Markus E. Nielsen
Weston R. Jacques
Joshua M. Taron
Cheryl E. Peters
Linda E. Carlson
Aaron A. Goodarzi
author_sort Justin A. Simms
title Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
title_short Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
title_full Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
title_fullStr Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
title_full_unstemmed Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
title_sort younger north americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6779b23c6d46472a9d09de059351bd80
work_keys_str_mv AT justinasimms youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT dustindpearson youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT natashalcholowsky youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT jesselirvine youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT markusenielsen youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT westonrjacques youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT joshuamtaron youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT cherylepeters youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT lindaecarlson youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
AT aaronagoodarzi youngernorthamericansareexposedtomoreradongasduetooccupancybiaseswithintheresidentialbuiltenvironment
_version_ 1718392084335951872