Common methods of biological age estimation

Linpei Jia,1–3 Weiguang Zhang,2,3 Xiangmei Chen1–3 1Department of Nephrology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, 2Department of Nephrology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 3State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia L, Zhang W, Chen X
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/678eb364790e4d1ab91b724d5e66c1cc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Linpei Jia,1–3 Weiguang Zhang,2,3 Xiangmei Chen1–3 1Department of Nephrology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, 2Department of Nephrology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 3State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China Abstract: At present, no single indicator could be used as a golden index to estimate aging process. The biological age (BA), which combines several important biomarkers with mathematical modeling, has been proposed for >50 years as an aging estimation method to replace chronological age (CA). The common methods used for BA estimation include the multiple linear regression (MLR), the principal component analysis (PCA), the Hochschild’s method, and the Klemera and Doubal’s method (KDM). The fundamental differences in these four methods are the roles of CA and the selection criteria of aging biomarkers. In MLR and PCA, CA is treated as the selection criterion and an independent index. The Hochschild’s method and KDM share a similar concept, making CA an independent variable. Previous studies have either simply constructed the BA model by one or compared the four methods together. However, reviews have yet to illustrate and compare the four methods systematically. Since the BA model is a potential estimation of aging for clinical use, such as predicting onset and prognosis of diseases, improving the elderly’s living qualities, and realizing successful aging, here we summarize previous BA studies, illustrate the basic statistical steps, and thoroughly discuss the comparisons among the four common BA estimation methods. Keywords: chronological age, statistical method, aging biomarker, statistical model