Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piotr Desperak, Michał Hawranek, Piotr Chodór, Andrzej Świątkowski, Jacek Kowalczyk, Andrzej Lekston, Mariusz Gąsior
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6798ebd2060341b4b64f71cc0c8167ed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6798ebd2060341b4b64f71cc0c8167ed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6798ebd2060341b4b64f71cc0c8167ed2021-12-02T17:18:43ZComparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction1734-93381897-429510.5114/aic.2020.93912https://doaj.org/article/6798ebd2060341b4b64f71cc0c8167ed2020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.termedia.pl/Comparison-of-the-everolimus-eluting-bioresorbable-vascular-scaffold-versus-the-everolimus-eluting-metallic-stent-in-real-world-patients-with-ST-segment-elevation-myocardial-infarction,35,40164,1,1.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1734-9338https://doaj.org/toc/1897-4295Piotr DesperakMichał HawranekPiotr ChodórAndrzej ŚwiątkowskiJacek KowalczykAndrzej LekstonMariusz GąsiorTermedia Publishing Housearticlebioresorbable vascular scaffold primary percutaneous coronary intervention acute myocardial infarction/st-segment elevation myocardial infarction everolimus-eluting stentMedicineRENAdvances in Interventional Cardiology, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 49-57 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bioresorbable vascular scaffold
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
acute myocardial infarction/st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
everolimus-eluting stent
Medicine
R
spellingShingle bioresorbable vascular scaffold
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
acute myocardial infarction/st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
everolimus-eluting stent
Medicine
R
Piotr Desperak
Michał Hawranek
Piotr Chodór
Andrzej Świątkowski
Jacek Kowalczyk
Andrzej Lekston
Mariusz Gąsior
Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
format article
author Piotr Desperak
Michał Hawranek
Piotr Chodór
Andrzej Świątkowski
Jacek Kowalczyk
Andrzej Lekston
Mariusz Gąsior
author_facet Piotr Desperak
Michał Hawranek
Piotr Chodór
Andrzej Świątkowski
Jacek Kowalczyk
Andrzej Lekston
Mariusz Gąsior
author_sort Piotr Desperak
title Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
publisher Termedia Publishing House
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/6798ebd2060341b4b64f71cc0c8167ed
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrdesperak comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT michałhawranek comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT piotrchodor comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT andrzejswiatkowski comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT jacekkowalczyk comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT andrzejlekston comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mariuszgasior comparisonoftheeverolimuselutingbioresorbablevascularscaffoldversustheeverolimuselutingmetallicstentinrealworldpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1718381090334310400