Hyperparameter optimisation and validation of registration algorithms for measuring regional ventricular deformation using retrospective gated computed tomography images

Abstract Recent dose reduction techniques have made retrospective computed tomography (CT) scans more applicable and extracting myocardial function from cardiac computed tomography (CCT) images feasible. However, hyperparameters of generic image intensity-based registration techniques, which are use...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orod Razeghi, Mattias Heinrich, Thomas E. Fastl, Cesare Corrado, Rashed Karim, Adelaide De Vecchi, Tom Banks, Patrick Donnelly, Jonathan M. Behar, Justin Gould, Ronak Rajani, Christopher A. Rinaldi, Steven Niederer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/679cf02eda8147b9be675fd9ac1dfbf8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Recent dose reduction techniques have made retrospective computed tomography (CT) scans more applicable and extracting myocardial function from cardiac computed tomography (CCT) images feasible. However, hyperparameters of generic image intensity-based registration techniques, which are used for tracking motion, have not been systematically optimised for this modality. There is limited work on their validation for measuring regional strains from retrospective gated CCT images and open-source software for motion analysis is not widely available. We calculated strain using our open-source platform by applying an image registration warping field to a triangulated mesh of the left ventricular endocardium. We optimised hyperparameters of two registration methods to track the wall motion. Both methods required a single semi-automated segmentation of the left ventricle cavity at end-diastolic phase. The motion was characterised by the circumferential and longitudinal strains, as well as local area change throughout the cardiac cycle from a dataset of 24 patients. The derived motion was validated against manually annotated anatomical landmarks and the calculation of strains were verified using idealised problems. Optimising hyperparameters of registration methods allowed tracking of anatomical measurements with a mean error of 6.63% across frames, landmarks, and patients, comparable to an intra-observer error of 7.98%. Both registration methods differentiated between normal and dyssynchronous contraction patterns based on circumferential strain ( $$p_1=0.0065$$ p 1 = 0.0065 , $$p_2=0.0011$$ p 2 = 0.0011 ). To test whether a typical 10 temporal frames sampling of retrospective gated CCT datasets affects measuring cardiac mechanics, we compared motion tracking results from 10 and 20 frames datasets and found a maximum error of $$8.51\pm 0.8\%$$ 8.51 ± 0.8 % . Our findings show that intensity-based registration techniques with optimal hyperparameters are able to accurately measure regional strains from CCT in a very short amount of time. Furthermore, sufficient sensitivity can be achieved to identify heart failure patients and left ventricle mechanics can be quantified with 10 reconstructed temporal frames. Our open-source platform will support increased use of CCT for quantifying cardiac mechanics.