A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?

This paper reviews the consideration of the operation of agricultural water control structures (AWCSs) as sources of bundles of ecosystem services (ESs) and the subsequent design of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs around these ESs. It is thought that PES schemes for AWCSs can complement...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Emmanuel Okiria, Muhamad Khoiru Zaki, Keigo Noda
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	agricultural water control structures ecosystem service irrigation and drainage scheme payment for ecosystem service valuing water Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/67c9d19343074aafbb255e742bd08a74
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:67c9d19343074aafbb255e742bd08a74
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:67c9d19343074aafbb255e742bd08a742021-11-25T19:02:40ZA Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?10.3390/su1322126242071-1050https://doaj.org/article/67c9d19343074aafbb255e742bd08a742021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12624https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This paper reviews the consideration of the operation of agricultural water control structures (AWCSs) as sources of bundles of ecosystem services (ESs) and the subsequent design of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs around these ESs. It is thought that PES schemes for AWCSs can complement irrigation service fees (ISFs) in funding the operation and maintenance of irrigation schemes. Case studies from Japan, the United States of America and Tanzania, representing a variety of socio-economic, geographic and climatic conditions, are discussed. In countries where the PES programs had legal backing, they showed evidence of sustainability and success. The measurement of marginal ESs flows from AWCSs proved to be one of the challenges to PES programs. There is a need to improve the measurement and modelling of hydro-meteorological and water quality parameters to ensure the transparency and success of the programs. In general, there was a realisation that ESs flow from irrigated agriculture, but there was no systematic design of PES programs around these ESs flows. An opportunity is seen to complement ISF through the design of PES programs around ES flows from the operation of AWCSs.Emmanuel OkiriaMuhamad Khoiru ZakiKeigo NodaMDPI AGarticleagricultural water control structuresecosystem serviceirrigation and drainage schemepayment for ecosystem servicevaluing waterEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12624, p 12624 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	agricultural water control structures ecosystem service irrigation and drainage scheme payment for ecosystem service valuing water Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	agricultural water control structures ecosystem service irrigation and drainage scheme payment for ecosystem service valuing water Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Emmanuel Okiria Muhamad Khoiru Zaki Keigo Noda A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
description	This paper reviews the consideration of the operation of agricultural water control structures (AWCSs) as sources of bundles of ecosystem services (ESs) and the subsequent design of payment for ecosystem service (PES) programs around these ESs. It is thought that PES schemes for AWCSs can complement irrigation service fees (ISFs) in funding the operation and maintenance of irrigation schemes. Case studies from Japan, the United States of America and Tanzania, representing a variety of socio-economic, geographic and climatic conditions, are discussed. In countries where the PES programs had legal backing, they showed evidence of sustainability and success. The measurement of marginal ESs flows from AWCSs proved to be one of the challenges to PES programs. There is a need to improve the measurement and modelling of hydro-meteorological and water quality parameters to ensure the transparency and success of the programs. In general, there was a realisation that ESs flow from irrigated agriculture, but there was no systematic design of PES programs around these ESs flows. An opportunity is seen to complement ISF through the design of PES programs around ES flows from the operation of AWCSs.
format	article
author	Emmanuel Okiria Muhamad Khoiru Zaki Keigo Noda
author_facet	Emmanuel Okiria Muhamad Khoiru Zaki Keigo Noda
author_sort	Emmanuel Okiria
title	A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
title_short	A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
title_full	A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
title_fullStr	A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
title_full_unstemmed	A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?
title_sort	review of payment for ecosystem services (pes) in agricultural water: are pes from the operation of agricultural water control structures ubiquitous?
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/67c9d19343074aafbb255e742bd08a74
work_keys_str_mv	AT emmanuelokiria areviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous AT muhamadkhoiruzaki areviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous AT keigonoda areviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous AT emmanuelokiria reviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous AT muhamadkhoiruzaki reviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous AT keigonoda reviewofpaymentforecosystemservicespesinagriculturalwaterarepesfromtheoperationofagriculturalwatercontrolstructuresubiquitous
_version_	1718410344472248320

A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?

Ejemplares similares