Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity

Fire severity represents fire-induced environmental changes and is an important variable for modeling fire emissions and planning post-fire rehabilitation. Remotely sensed fire severity is traditionally evaluated using the differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR) derived from multispectral imagery....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Max J. van Gerrevink, Sander Veraverbeke
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/68312b40f83a4b53abfa01abff4300b3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:68312b40f83a4b53abfa01abff4300b3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:68312b40f83a4b53abfa01abff4300b32021-11-25T18:54:46ZEvaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity10.3390/rs132246112072-4292https://doaj.org/article/68312b40f83a4b53abfa01abff4300b32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4611https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292Fire severity represents fire-induced environmental changes and is an important variable for modeling fire emissions and planning post-fire rehabilitation. Remotely sensed fire severity is traditionally evaluated using the differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR) derived from multispectral imagery. This spectral index is based on bi-temporal differenced reflectance changes caused by fires in the near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectral regions. Our study aims to evaluate the spectral sensitivity of the dNBR using hyperspectral imagery by identifying the optimal bi-spectral NIR SWIR combination. This assessment made use of a rare opportunity arising from the pre- and post-fire airborne image acquisitions over the 2013 Rim and 2014 King fires in California with the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) sensor. The 224 contiguous bands of this sensor allow for 5760 unique combinations of the dNBR at a high spatial resolution of approximately 15 m. The performance of the hyperspectral dNBR was assessed by comparison against field data and the spectral optimality statistic. The field data is composed of 83 in situ measurements of fire severity using the Geometrically structured Composite Burn Index (GeoCBI) protocol. The optimality statistic ranges between zero and one, with one denoting an optimal measurement of the fire-induced spectral change. We also combined the field and optimality assessments into a combined score. The hyperspectral dNBR combinations demonstrated strong relationships with GeoCBI field data. The best performance of the dNBR combination was derived from bands 63, centered at 0.962 µm, and 218, centered at 2.382 µm. This bi-spectral combination yielded a strong relationship with GeoCBI field data of R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70 based on a saturated growth model and a median spectral index optimality statistic of 0.31. Our hyperspectral sensitivity analysis revealed optimal NIR and SWIR bands for the composition of the dNBR that are outside the ranges of the NIR and SWIR bands of the Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 sensors. With the launch of the Precursore Iperspettrale Della Missione Applicativa (PRISMA) in 2019 and several planned spaceborne hyperspectral missions, such as the Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program (EnMAP) and Surface Biology and Geology (SBG), our study provides a timely assessment of the potential and sensitivity of hyperspectral data for assessing fire severity.Max J. van GerrevinkSander VeraverbekeMDPI AGarticlefire severitydifferenced normalized burn ratiocomposite burn indexspectral index optimalityhyperspectral imageryAirborne Visible/Infrared Imaging SpectrometerScienceQENRemote Sensing, Vol 13, Iss 4611, p 4611 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fire severity
differenced normalized burn ratio
composite burn index
spectral index optimality
hyperspectral imagery
Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer
Science
Q
spellingShingle fire severity
differenced normalized burn ratio
composite burn index
spectral index optimality
hyperspectral imagery
Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer
Science
Q
Max J. van Gerrevink
Sander Veraverbeke
Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
description Fire severity represents fire-induced environmental changes and is an important variable for modeling fire emissions and planning post-fire rehabilitation. Remotely sensed fire severity is traditionally evaluated using the differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR) derived from multispectral imagery. This spectral index is based on bi-temporal differenced reflectance changes caused by fires in the near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectral regions. Our study aims to evaluate the spectral sensitivity of the dNBR using hyperspectral imagery by identifying the optimal bi-spectral NIR SWIR combination. This assessment made use of a rare opportunity arising from the pre- and post-fire airborne image acquisitions over the 2013 Rim and 2014 King fires in California with the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) sensor. The 224 contiguous bands of this sensor allow for 5760 unique combinations of the dNBR at a high spatial resolution of approximately 15 m. The performance of the hyperspectral dNBR was assessed by comparison against field data and the spectral optimality statistic. The field data is composed of 83 in situ measurements of fire severity using the Geometrically structured Composite Burn Index (GeoCBI) protocol. The optimality statistic ranges between zero and one, with one denoting an optimal measurement of the fire-induced spectral change. We also combined the field and optimality assessments into a combined score. The hyperspectral dNBR combinations demonstrated strong relationships with GeoCBI field data. The best performance of the dNBR combination was derived from bands 63, centered at 0.962 µm, and 218, centered at 2.382 µm. This bi-spectral combination yielded a strong relationship with GeoCBI field data of R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70 based on a saturated growth model and a median spectral index optimality statistic of 0.31. Our hyperspectral sensitivity analysis revealed optimal NIR and SWIR bands for the composition of the dNBR that are outside the ranges of the NIR and SWIR bands of the Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 sensors. With the launch of the Precursore Iperspettrale Della Missione Applicativa (PRISMA) in 2019 and several planned spaceborne hyperspectral missions, such as the Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program (EnMAP) and Surface Biology and Geology (SBG), our study provides a timely assessment of the potential and sensitivity of hyperspectral data for assessing fire severity.
format article
author Max J. van Gerrevink
Sander Veraverbeke
author_facet Max J. van Gerrevink
Sander Veraverbeke
author_sort Max J. van Gerrevink
title Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
title_short Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
title_full Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
title_fullStr Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Hyperspectral Sensitivity of the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity
title_sort evaluating the hyperspectral sensitivity of the differenced normalized burn ratio for assessing fire severity
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/68312b40f83a4b53abfa01abff4300b3
work_keys_str_mv AT maxjvangerrevink evaluatingthehyperspectralsensitivityofthedifferencednormalizedburnratioforassessingfireseverity
AT sanderveraverbeke evaluatingthehyperspectralsensitivityofthedifferencednormalizedburnratioforassessingfireseverity
_version_ 1718410527781158912