Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires

The article studies the collapse of Rzeczpospolita and the admission of its parts into the Russian and Austrian Empires to understand through the institutionalist approach the consequences of reformatting the geopolitical space, namely, implantation of the debris of the collapsed society into anothe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: P. A. Barakhvostov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/68c2f16dc4a946129454cf7375186f83
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:68c2f16dc4a946129454cf7375186f83
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:68c2f16dc4a946129454cf7375186f832021-11-23T14:51:03ZInstitutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-51-69https://doaj.org/article/68c2f16dc4a946129454cf7375186f832021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2937https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The article studies the collapse of Rzeczpospolita and the admission of its parts into the Russian and Austrian Empires to understand through the institutionalist approach the consequences of reformatting the geopolitical space, namely, implantation of the debris of the collapsed society into another social system. It reveals the mechanisms of the fusion of donor and recipient societies. They include unification – the integration of new territories into the legal and administrative-territorial organization of the acceptor country. This mechanism proceeds through several stages: initial, implying the creation of hybrid institutions (implementation of the new authorities into the pre-existing system of power); secondary, when the institutional transplants are rebuilt with the simultaneous foundation of intermediate institutions); final (the ultimate restructuring of power following the new model). A vital instrument of unification is constituted by estate homogenization or the alignment of the social organization of the new lands and the acceptor society. Besides, among the mechanisms of integration, there are conditionality (positive, or stimulating, for extending the social base of transformations as well as negative, intended to curb resentment), substitution (admission of representatives of the acceptor society to the higher estate of the new lands),socialization (measures to culturally homogenize the united social system). Despite the similarity of the employed mechanisms, there is a difference in the integration models applied by the Russian and Austrian Empires, which is due to the specificities of the state organization and national structure of these empires as well as the geographical location and the level of economic development of the acquired territories. The distinctive feature of the Russian approach to homogenization of the new lands with the rest of the empire was transplantation of economic, political, and social-cultural institutions to the acquired territories with preservation of some pre-existing endemic economic institutions. The Austrian policy was haracterized by asymmetrical and limited institutional transplantations (only political institutions) to the new province, which turned the region into a virtual inner colony. The meaning of the chosen integration model for the later development of the integrated lands is also discussed.P. A. BarakhvostovMGIMO University Pressarticlegeopolitical spaceempireinstitutional matrixbasic institutionsredistributive economymarket relationscrisisbifurcation pointintegrationinstitutional transformationsInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 14, Iss 4, Pp 51-69 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic geopolitical space
empire
institutional matrix
basic institutions
redistributive economy
market relations
crisis
bifurcation point
integration
institutional transformations
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle geopolitical space
empire
institutional matrix
basic institutions
redistributive economy
market relations
crisis
bifurcation point
integration
institutional transformations
International relations
JZ2-6530
P. A. Barakhvostov
Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
description The article studies the collapse of Rzeczpospolita and the admission of its parts into the Russian and Austrian Empires to understand through the institutionalist approach the consequences of reformatting the geopolitical space, namely, implantation of the debris of the collapsed society into another social system. It reveals the mechanisms of the fusion of donor and recipient societies. They include unification – the integration of new territories into the legal and administrative-territorial organization of the acceptor country. This mechanism proceeds through several stages: initial, implying the creation of hybrid institutions (implementation of the new authorities into the pre-existing system of power); secondary, when the institutional transplants are rebuilt with the simultaneous foundation of intermediate institutions); final (the ultimate restructuring of power following the new model). A vital instrument of unification is constituted by estate homogenization or the alignment of the social organization of the new lands and the acceptor society. Besides, among the mechanisms of integration, there are conditionality (positive, or stimulating, for extending the social base of transformations as well as negative, intended to curb resentment), substitution (admission of representatives of the acceptor society to the higher estate of the new lands),socialization (measures to culturally homogenize the united social system). Despite the similarity of the employed mechanisms, there is a difference in the integration models applied by the Russian and Austrian Empires, which is due to the specificities of the state organization and national structure of these empires as well as the geographical location and the level of economic development of the acquired territories. The distinctive feature of the Russian approach to homogenization of the new lands with the rest of the empire was transplantation of economic, political, and social-cultural institutions to the acquired territories with preservation of some pre-existing endemic economic institutions. The Austrian policy was haracterized by asymmetrical and limited institutional transplantations (only political institutions) to the new province, which turned the region into a virtual inner colony. The meaning of the chosen integration model for the later development of the integrated lands is also discussed.
format article
author P. A. Barakhvostov
author_facet P. A. Barakhvostov
author_sort P. A. Barakhvostov
title Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
title_short Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
title_full Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
title_fullStr Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires
title_sort institutional analysis of the integration of rzeczpospolita lands in-to the russian and austrian empires
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/68c2f16dc4a946129454cf7375186f83
work_keys_str_mv AT pabarakhvostov institutionalanalysisoftheintegrationofrzeczpospolitalandsintotherussianandaustrianempires
_version_ 1718416211792887808