Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study

Abstract This study aimed to assess the apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation of primary canines using three endodontic file types. Forty-five extracted primary canines were randomly assigned to three instrumentation groups (n = 15): Hand K-files; and the motorized Kedo-S files and XP-en...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bhaggyashri A. Pawar, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Jatin Atram, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Anuj Bhardwaj, Anda Kfir, Zvi Metzger, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/68c718201842436b845996a2911f0199
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:68c718201842436b845996a2911f0199
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:68c718201842436b845996a2911f01992021-12-02T10:54:06ZApical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study10.1038/s41598-021-83522-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/68c718201842436b845996a2911f01992021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83522-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to assess the apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation of primary canines using three endodontic file types. Forty-five extracted primary canines were randomly assigned to three instrumentation groups (n = 15): Hand K-files; and the motorized Kedo-S files and XP-endo Shaper files. The apically extruded debris produced during the procedure was collected and dried in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes, and the mass of debris was calculated. The time required for the endodontic procedure was also recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test were used with a significance level set at 5%. XP-endo Shaper and Kedo-S files extruded significantly less debris compared with hand K-files with means of 0.84 ± 0.31 and 1.20 ± 0.67 mg respectively, compared to 2.13 ± 0.31 mg (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two motorized files. Less time was required to complete the procedure with the XP-endo Shaper compared to the hand K-files (p < 0.0001) and Kedo-S files (p < 0.0001). Within the limitations of the present study, it may be concluded that motorized files extruded less debris and required less instrumentation time compared to traditional K-files, which could benefit paediatric patients with root canal treatment needs.Bhaggyashri A. PawarAjinkya M. PawarJatin AtramAlexander Maniangat LukeAnuj BhardwajAnda KfirZvi MetzgerDian Agustin WahjuningrumNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Bhaggyashri A. Pawar Ajinkya M. Pawar Jatin Atram Alexander Maniangat Luke Anuj Bhardwaj Anda Kfir Zvi Metzger Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
description	Abstract This study aimed to assess the apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation of primary canines using three endodontic file types. Forty-five extracted primary canines were randomly assigned to three instrumentation groups (n = 15): Hand K-files; and the motorized Kedo-S files and XP-endo Shaper files. The apically extruded debris produced during the procedure was collected and dried in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes, and the mass of debris was calculated. The time required for the endodontic procedure was also recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test were used with a significance level set at 5%. XP-endo Shaper and Kedo-S files extruded significantly less debris compared with hand K-files with means of 0.84 ± 0.31 and 1.20 ± 0.67 mg respectively, compared to 2.13 ± 0.31 mg (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two motorized files. Less time was required to complete the procedure with the XP-endo Shaper compared to the hand K-files (p < 0.0001) and Kedo-S files (p < 0.0001). Within the limitations of the present study, it may be concluded that motorized files extruded less debris and required less instrumentation time compared to traditional K-files, which could benefit paediatric patients with root canal treatment needs.
format	article
author	Bhaggyashri A. Pawar Ajinkya M. Pawar Jatin Atram Alexander Maniangat Luke Anuj Bhardwaj Anda Kfir Zvi Metzger Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum
author_facet	Bhaggyashri A. Pawar Ajinkya M. Pawar Jatin Atram Alexander Maniangat Luke Anuj Bhardwaj Anda Kfir Zvi Metzger Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum
author_sort	Bhaggyashri A. Pawar
title	Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
title_short	Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
title_full	Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
title_fullStr	Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed	Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
title_sort	apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/68c718201842436b845996a2911f0199
work_keys_str_mv	AT bhaggyashriapawar apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT ajinkyampawar apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT jatinatram apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT alexandermaniangatluke apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT anujbhardwaj apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT andakfir apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT zvimetzger apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy AT dianagustinwahjuningrum apicaldebrisextrusionduringinstrumentationofovalrootcanalsinprimaryteethusingmanualversusmotorizedfilesanexvivostudy
_version_	1718396473643630592

Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study

Ejemplares similares