D-Dimer Tests in the Emergency Department: Current Insights

Francesca Innocenti, Cristian Lazzari, Francesca Ricci, Elisa Paolucci, Ilya Agishev, Riccardo Pini Emergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, ItalyCorrespondence: Francesca Innocenti Lg. Brambilla 4, Florence,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Innocenti F, Lazzari C, Ricci F, Paolucci E, Agishev I, Pini R
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/695ca416f1744c99a1cd24fa150c3916
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Francesca Innocenti, Cristian Lazzari, Francesca Ricci, Elisa Paolucci, Ilya Agishev, Riccardo Pini Emergency Department High-Dependency Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, ItalyCorrespondence: Francesca Innocenti Lg. Brambilla 4, Florence, 50144, ItalyTel +39 333 9117845Email innocenti.fra66@gmail.comAbstract: In the Emergency Medicine setting, D-dimer is currently employed in the diagnostic assessment of suspected venous thromboembolism and aortic syndrome. The nonspecific symptoms reported by patients, like chest pain, dyspnea or syncope, uncover a wide range of differential diagnosis, spanning from mild to life-threatening conditions. Therefore, we assumed the perspective of the Emergency Physician and, in this narrative review, we reported a brief presentation of the epidemiology of these symptoms and the characteristics of patients, in whom we could suspect the aforementioned pathologies. We also reported in which patients D-dimer gives useful information. In fact, when the probability of the disease is high, the D-dimer level is futile. On the contrary, given the low specificity of the test, when the probability of the disease is very low, a false-positive value of the D-dimer only increases the risk of overtesting. Patients with low to moderate probability really benefit from the D-dimer testing, in order to prevent the execution of expensive and potentially dangerous imaging tests. In the second part of the review, we focused on the prognostic value of the test in septic patients. The early prognostic stratification of septic patients remains a challenge for the Emergency Physician, in the absence of a definite biomarker or score to rely on. Therefore, we need several parameters for the early identification of patients at risk of an adverse prognosis and the D-dimer may play a role in this demanding task. SARS COVID-19 patients represent an emerging reality, where the role of the D-dimer for prognostic stratification could be relevant. In fact, in patients with severe forms of this disease, the D-dimer reaches very high values, which appear to parallel the course of respiratory failure. Whether the test may add useful information for the management of these patients remains to be determined.Keywords: venous thromboembolism, aortic syndromes, diagnostic assessment, sepsis, COVID-19, prognostic stratification