Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia

Abstract This study aimed to clarify and provide clinical evidence for which computed tomography (CT) assessment method can more appropriately reflect lung lesion burden of the COVID-19 pneumonia. A total of 244 COVID-19 patients were recruited from three local hospitals. All the patients were assig...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaojun Guan, Liding Yao, Yanbin Tan, Zhujing Shen, Hanpeng Zheng, Haisheng Zhou, Yuantong Gao, Yongchou Li, Wenbin Ji, Huangqi Zhang, Jun Wang, Minming Zhang, Xiaojun Xu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6995d148b5574b1186ee2dcfeed31cdb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6995d148b5574b1186ee2dcfeed31cdb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6995d148b5574b1186ee2dcfeed31cdb2021-12-02T15:53:46ZQuantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia10.1038/s41598-021-84561-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6995d148b5574b1186ee2dcfeed31cdb2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84561-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to clarify and provide clinical evidence for which computed tomography (CT) assessment method can more appropriately reflect lung lesion burden of the COVID-19 pneumonia. A total of 244 COVID-19 patients were recruited from three local hospitals. All the patients were assigned to mild, common and severe types. Semi-quantitative assessment methods, e.g., lobar-, segmental-based CT scores and opacity-weighted score, and quantitative assessment method, i.e., lesion volume quantification, were applied to quantify the lung lesions. All four assessment methods had high inter-rater agreements. At the group level, the lesion load in severe type patients was consistently observed to be significantly higher than that in common type in the applications of four assessment methods (all the p < 0.001). In discriminating severe from common patients at the individual level, results for lobe-based, segment-based and opacity-weighted assessments had high true positives while the quantitative lesion volume had high true negatives. In conclusion, both semi-quantitative and quantitative methods have excellent repeatability in measuring inflammatory lesions, and can well distinguish between common type and severe type patients. Lobe-based CT score is fast, readily clinically available, and has a high sensitivity in identifying severe type patients. It is suggested to be a prioritized method for assessing the burden of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients.Xiaojun GuanLiding YaoYanbin TanZhujing ShenHanpeng ZhengHaisheng ZhouYuantong GaoYongchou LiWenbin JiHuangqi ZhangJun WangMinming ZhangXiaojun XuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xiaojun Guan
Liding Yao
Yanbin Tan
Zhujing Shen
Hanpeng Zheng
Haisheng Zhou
Yuantong Gao
Yongchou Li
Wenbin Ji
Huangqi Zhang
Jun Wang
Minming Zhang
Xiaojun Xu
Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
description Abstract This study aimed to clarify and provide clinical evidence for which computed tomography (CT) assessment method can more appropriately reflect lung lesion burden of the COVID-19 pneumonia. A total of 244 COVID-19 patients were recruited from three local hospitals. All the patients were assigned to mild, common and severe types. Semi-quantitative assessment methods, e.g., lobar-, segmental-based CT scores and opacity-weighted score, and quantitative assessment method, i.e., lesion volume quantification, were applied to quantify the lung lesions. All four assessment methods had high inter-rater agreements. At the group level, the lesion load in severe type patients was consistently observed to be significantly higher than that in common type in the applications of four assessment methods (all the p < 0.001). In discriminating severe from common patients at the individual level, results for lobe-based, segment-based and opacity-weighted assessments had high true positives while the quantitative lesion volume had high true negatives. In conclusion, both semi-quantitative and quantitative methods have excellent repeatability in measuring inflammatory lesions, and can well distinguish between common type and severe type patients. Lobe-based CT score is fast, readily clinically available, and has a high sensitivity in identifying severe type patients. It is suggested to be a prioritized method for assessing the burden of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients.
format article
author Xiaojun Guan
Liding Yao
Yanbin Tan
Zhujing Shen
Hanpeng Zheng
Haisheng Zhou
Yuantong Gao
Yongchou Li
Wenbin Ji
Huangqi Zhang
Jun Wang
Minming Zhang
Xiaojun Xu
author_facet Xiaojun Guan
Liding Yao
Yanbin Tan
Zhujing Shen
Hanpeng Zheng
Haisheng Zhou
Yuantong Gao
Yongchou Li
Wenbin Ji
Huangqi Zhang
Jun Wang
Minming Zhang
Xiaojun Xu
author_sort Xiaojun Guan
title Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_short Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_fullStr Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and semi-quantitative CT assessments of lung lesion burden in COVID-19 pneumonia
title_sort quantitative and semi-quantitative ct assessments of lung lesion burden in covid-19 pneumonia
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6995d148b5574b1186ee2dcfeed31cdb
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaojunguan quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT lidingyao quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT yanbintan quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT zhujingshen quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT hanpengzheng quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT haishengzhou quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT yuantonggao quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT yongchouli quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT wenbinji quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT huangqizhang quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT junwang quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT minmingzhang quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
AT xiaojunxu quantitativeandsemiquantitativectassessmentsoflunglesionburdenincovid19pneumonia
_version_ 1718385513611657216