For the good of the Nation

This article analyzes Rifaʿa al-Tahtawi’s (d. 1873) idea of Egyptian nationhood (al-ummah al-miṣriyyah) and key attendant concepts, such as civilization (tamaddun), progress (taqaddum), homeland (waṭan), and citizen (waṭanī). I revisit the intellectual origins of his thought to move our unders...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: David H. Warren
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/699d4220fca140c4a6b23196501e9239
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:699d4220fca140c4a6b23196501e9239
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:699d4220fca140c4a6b23196501e92392021-12-02T17:46:16ZFor the good of the Nation10.35632/ajis.v34i4.1782690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/699d4220fca140c4a6b23196501e92392017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/178https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 This article analyzes Rifaʿa al-Tahtawi’s (d. 1873) idea of Egyptian nationhood (al-ummah al-miṣriyyah) and key attendant concepts, such as civilization (tamaddun), progress (taqaddum), homeland (waṭan), and citizen (waṭanī). I revisit the intellectual origins of his thought to move our understanding of his intellectual production beyond simply the influence of the European Enlightenment. Instead, I locate al-Tahtawi’s work as part of a conversation internal to the debates of the Islamic tradition, which stretches across centuries and was never meant to finish. Consequently, I contextualize his conceptualization of nationhood as an attempt to re-imagine a role for the Muslim community in Islamic political life – from which it had long been excluded – and ground Muslim political theory and practice within a normative Islamic framework. Furthermore, I contend that al-Tahtawi’s contributions to both the conversations of his immediate context and those of his tradition were underpinned by a shift in his generation’s horizon of expectations, namely, the shared assumptions through which they received the conversations of their tradition. Underpinning this shift was the redefinition of time as progress, specifically the progress of the nation. If we conceptualize the Islamic tradition as a framework for inquiry rather than as a set of doctrines, then we should recognize that al-Tahtawi and his peers’ new concern for the futurity of the nation represented a key addition to this framework. David H. WarrenInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 34, Iss 4 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
David H. Warren
For the good of the Nation
description This article analyzes Rifaʿa al-Tahtawi’s (d. 1873) idea of Egyptian nationhood (al-ummah al-miṣriyyah) and key attendant concepts, such as civilization (tamaddun), progress (taqaddum), homeland (waṭan), and citizen (waṭanī). I revisit the intellectual origins of his thought to move our understanding of his intellectual production beyond simply the influence of the European Enlightenment. Instead, I locate al-Tahtawi’s work as part of a conversation internal to the debates of the Islamic tradition, which stretches across centuries and was never meant to finish. Consequently, I contextualize his conceptualization of nationhood as an attempt to re-imagine a role for the Muslim community in Islamic political life – from which it had long been excluded – and ground Muslim political theory and practice within a normative Islamic framework. Furthermore, I contend that al-Tahtawi’s contributions to both the conversations of his immediate context and those of his tradition were underpinned by a shift in his generation’s horizon of expectations, namely, the shared assumptions through which they received the conversations of their tradition. Underpinning this shift was the redefinition of time as progress, specifically the progress of the nation. If we conceptualize the Islamic tradition as a framework for inquiry rather than as a set of doctrines, then we should recognize that al-Tahtawi and his peers’ new concern for the futurity of the nation represented a key addition to this framework.
format article
author David H. Warren
author_facet David H. Warren
author_sort David H. Warren
title For the good of the Nation
title_short For the good of the Nation
title_full For the good of the Nation
title_fullStr For the good of the Nation
title_full_unstemmed For the good of the Nation
title_sort for the good of the nation
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/699d4220fca140c4a6b23196501e9239
work_keys_str_mv AT davidhwarren forthegoodofthenation
_version_ 1718379533649838080