PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods

Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and are present in niches where bacteria thrive. In recent years, the suggested application areas of lytic bacteriophage have been expanded to include therapy, biocontrol, detection, sanitation, and remediation. However, phage application is constraine...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlos E. Martinez-Soto, Stevan Cucić, Janet T. Lin, Sarah Kirst, El Sayed Mahmoud, Cezar M. Khursigara, Hany Anany
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/69bbd70a67d04b8f88bd16f329461b5e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:69bbd70a67d04b8f88bd16f329461b5e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:69bbd70a67d04b8f88bd16f329461b5e2021-11-25T19:12:24ZPHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods10.3390/v131121201999-4915https://doaj.org/article/69bbd70a67d04b8f88bd16f329461b5e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/11/2120https://doaj.org/toc/1999-4915Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and are present in niches where bacteria thrive. In recent years, the suggested application areas of lytic bacteriophage have been expanded to include therapy, biocontrol, detection, sanitation, and remediation. However, phage application is constrained by the phage’s host range—the range of bacterial hosts sensitive to the phage and the degree of infection. Even though phage isolation and enrichment techniques are straightforward protocols, the correlation between the enrichment technique and host range profile has not been evaluated. Agar-based methods such as spotting assay and efficiency of plaquing (EOP) are the most used methods to determine the phage host range. These methods, aside from being labor intensive, can lead to subjective and incomplete results as they rely on qualitative observations of the lysis/plaques, do not reflect the lytic activity in liquid culture, and can overestimate the host range. In this study, phages against three bacterial genera were isolated using three different enrichment methods. Host range profiles of the isolated phages were quantitatively determined using a high throughput turbidimetric protocol and the data were analyzed with an accessible analytic tool “PHIDA”. Using this tool, the host ranges of 9 <i>Listeria,</i> 14 <i>Salmonella</i>, and 20 <i>Pseudomonas</i> phages isolated with different enrichment methods were quantitatively compared. A high variability in the host range index (<i>HR<sub>i</sub>)</i> ranging from 0.86–0.63, 0.07–0.24, and 0.00–0.67 for <i>Listeria, Salmonella,</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> phages, respectively, was observed. Overall, no direct correlation was found between the phage host range breadth and the enrichment method in any of the three target bacterial genera. The high throughput method and analytics tool developed in this study can be easily adapted to any phage study and can provide a consensus for phage host range determination.Carlos E. Martinez-SotoStevan CucićJanet T. LinSarah KirstEl Sayed MahmoudCezar M. KhursigaraHany AnanyMDPI AGarticlebacteriophageisolation protocolhost rangephage biocontrolphage therapyphage enrichmentMicrobiologyQR1-502ENViruses, Vol 13, Iss 2120, p 2120 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bacteriophage
isolation protocol
host range
phage biocontrol
phage therapy
phage enrichment
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle bacteriophage
isolation protocol
host range
phage biocontrol
phage therapy
phage enrichment
Microbiology
QR1-502
Carlos E. Martinez-Soto
Stevan Cucić
Janet T. Lin
Sarah Kirst
El Sayed Mahmoud
Cezar M. Khursigara
Hany Anany
PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
description Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and are present in niches where bacteria thrive. In recent years, the suggested application areas of lytic bacteriophage have been expanded to include therapy, biocontrol, detection, sanitation, and remediation. However, phage application is constrained by the phage’s host range—the range of bacterial hosts sensitive to the phage and the degree of infection. Even though phage isolation and enrichment techniques are straightforward protocols, the correlation between the enrichment technique and host range profile has not been evaluated. Agar-based methods such as spotting assay and efficiency of plaquing (EOP) are the most used methods to determine the phage host range. These methods, aside from being labor intensive, can lead to subjective and incomplete results as they rely on qualitative observations of the lysis/plaques, do not reflect the lytic activity in liquid culture, and can overestimate the host range. In this study, phages against three bacterial genera were isolated using three different enrichment methods. Host range profiles of the isolated phages were quantitatively determined using a high throughput turbidimetric protocol and the data were analyzed with an accessible analytic tool “PHIDA”. Using this tool, the host ranges of 9 <i>Listeria,</i> 14 <i>Salmonella</i>, and 20 <i>Pseudomonas</i> phages isolated with different enrichment methods were quantitatively compared. A high variability in the host range index (<i>HR<sub>i</sub>)</i> ranging from 0.86–0.63, 0.07–0.24, and 0.00–0.67 for <i>Listeria, Salmonella,</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> phages, respectively, was observed. Overall, no direct correlation was found between the phage host range breadth and the enrichment method in any of the three target bacterial genera. The high throughput method and analytics tool developed in this study can be easily adapted to any phage study and can provide a consensus for phage host range determination.
format article
author Carlos E. Martinez-Soto
Stevan Cucić
Janet T. Lin
Sarah Kirst
El Sayed Mahmoud
Cezar M. Khursigara
Hany Anany
author_facet Carlos E. Martinez-Soto
Stevan Cucić
Janet T. Lin
Sarah Kirst
El Sayed Mahmoud
Cezar M. Khursigara
Hany Anany
author_sort Carlos E. Martinez-Soto
title PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
title_short PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
title_full PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
title_fullStr PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
title_full_unstemmed PHIDA: A High Throughput Turbidimetric Data Analytic Tool to Compare Host Range Profiles of Bacteriophages Isolated Using Different Enrichment Methods
title_sort phida: a high throughput turbidimetric data analytic tool to compare host range profiles of bacteriophages isolated using different enrichment methods
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/69bbd70a67d04b8f88bd16f329461b5e
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosemartinezsoto phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT stevancucic phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT janettlin phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT sarahkirst phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT elsayedmahmoud phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT cezarmkhursigara phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
AT hanyanany phidaahighthroughputturbidimetricdataanalytictooltocomparehostrangeprofilesofbacteriophagesisolatedusingdifferentenrichmentmethods
_version_ 1718410161198989312