Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields

The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield. Here, the authors challenge this common conception using reductive catalytic fractionation in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eric M. Anderson, Michael L. Stone, Rui Katahira, Michelle Reed, Wellington Muchero, Kelsey J. Ramirez, Gregg T. Beckham, Yuriy Román-Leshkov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6a47b3f5914b41c8af1ae248aac03d92
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6a47b3f5914b41c8af1ae248aac03d92
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6a47b3f5914b41c8af1ae248aac03d922021-12-02T14:39:38ZDifferences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields10.1038/s41467-019-09986-12041-1723https://doaj.org/article/6a47b3f5914b41c8af1ae248aac03d922019-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield. Here, the authors challenge this common conception using reductive catalytic fractionation in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios.Eric M. AndersonMichael L. StoneRui KatahiraMichelle ReedWellington MucheroKelsey J. RamirezGregg T. BeckhamYuriy Román-LeshkovNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Science
Q
spellingShingle Science
Q
Eric M. Anderson
Michael L. Stone
Rui Katahira
Michelle Reed
Wellington Muchero
Kelsey J. Ramirez
Gregg T. Beckham
Yuriy Román-Leshkov
Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
description The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield. Here, the authors challenge this common conception using reductive catalytic fractionation in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios.
format article
author Eric M. Anderson
Michael L. Stone
Rui Katahira
Michelle Reed
Wellington Muchero
Kelsey J. Ramirez
Gregg T. Beckham
Yuriy Román-Leshkov
author_facet Eric M. Anderson
Michael L. Stone
Rui Katahira
Michelle Reed
Wellington Muchero
Kelsey J. Ramirez
Gregg T. Beckham
Yuriy Román-Leshkov
author_sort Eric M. Anderson
title Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_short Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_full Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_fullStr Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_full_unstemmed Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_sort differences in s/g ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/6a47b3f5914b41c8af1ae248aac03d92
work_keys_str_mv AT ericmanderson differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT michaellstone differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT ruikatahira differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT michellereed differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT wellingtonmuchero differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT kelseyjramirez differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT greggtbeckham differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT yuriyromanleshkov differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
_version_ 1718390535489585152