Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center

Abstract Low cut-off of FIB-4 is a widely used formula to exclude advanced liver fibrosis in primary care centers. However, the range of reported threshold of FIB-4 to rule in advanced fibrosis is too broad across etiologies, and no consensus has been reached. In the present study, we investigated t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun Hwa Roh, Bo-Kyeong Kang, Dae Won Jun, Chul-min Lee, Mimi Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6a7ed62afb2942a6a93d65a1a9ed6627
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6a7ed62afb2942a6a93d65a1a9ed6627
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6a7ed62afb2942a6a93d65a1a9ed66272021-12-02T14:34:03ZRole of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center10.1038/s41598-021-93038-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6a7ed62afb2942a6a93d65a1a9ed66272021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93038-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Low cut-off of FIB-4 is a widely used formula to exclude advanced liver fibrosis in primary care centers. However, the range of reported threshold of FIB-4 to rule in advanced fibrosis is too broad across etiologies, and no consensus has been reached. In the present study, we investigated the role of FIB-4 for a reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in a referral center. We compared the diagnostic performance of FIB-4 among patients with liver disease of various causes and tried to find an optimal cut-off value for predicting advanced fibrosis. Among 1068 patients, the AUROC of FIB-4 to diagnose advanced fibrosis showed no significant difference among the various etiologies of liver disease, ranging from 0.783 to 0.821. The optimal cut-off value obtained by maximizing Youden's index was 2.68, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting advanced fibrosis were 70.7%, 79.1%, 43.5%, and 92.2%, respectively. The PPV was low in patients with autoimmune disease (6.67%). When we incorporated the new cut-off of FIB-4 into abdominal ultrasound findings, 81% of unnecessary work-ups would be appropriately avoided. In conclusion, the cut-off value of 2.68 showed an acceptable PPV while maintaining a high NPV to predict advanced fibrosis, most etiology except for autoimmune diseases. This result could assist in establishing an appropriate timing to reassess the hepatic fibrosis burden during monitoring in the referral center.Yun Hwa RohBo-Kyeong KangDae Won JunChul-min LeeMimi KimNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Yun Hwa Roh
Bo-Kyeong Kang
Dae Won Jun
Chul-min Lee
Mimi Kim
Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
description Abstract Low cut-off of FIB-4 is a widely used formula to exclude advanced liver fibrosis in primary care centers. However, the range of reported threshold of FIB-4 to rule in advanced fibrosis is too broad across etiologies, and no consensus has been reached. In the present study, we investigated the role of FIB-4 for a reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in a referral center. We compared the diagnostic performance of FIB-4 among patients with liver disease of various causes and tried to find an optimal cut-off value for predicting advanced fibrosis. Among 1068 patients, the AUROC of FIB-4 to diagnose advanced fibrosis showed no significant difference among the various etiologies of liver disease, ranging from 0.783 to 0.821. The optimal cut-off value obtained by maximizing Youden's index was 2.68, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting advanced fibrosis were 70.7%, 79.1%, 43.5%, and 92.2%, respectively. The PPV was low in patients with autoimmune disease (6.67%). When we incorporated the new cut-off of FIB-4 into abdominal ultrasound findings, 81% of unnecessary work-ups would be appropriately avoided. In conclusion, the cut-off value of 2.68 showed an acceptable PPV while maintaining a high NPV to predict advanced fibrosis, most etiology except for autoimmune diseases. This result could assist in establishing an appropriate timing to reassess the hepatic fibrosis burden during monitoring in the referral center.
format article
author Yun Hwa Roh
Bo-Kyeong Kang
Dae Won Jun
Chul-min Lee
Mimi Kim
author_facet Yun Hwa Roh
Bo-Kyeong Kang
Dae Won Jun
Chul-min Lee
Mimi Kim
author_sort Yun Hwa Roh
title Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
title_short Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
title_full Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
title_fullStr Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
title_full_unstemmed Role of FIB-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
title_sort role of fib-4 for reassessment of hepatic fibrosis burden in referral center
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6a7ed62afb2942a6a93d65a1a9ed6627
work_keys_str_mv AT yunhwaroh roleoffib4forreassessmentofhepaticfibrosisburdeninreferralcenter
AT bokyeongkang roleoffib4forreassessmentofhepaticfibrosisburdeninreferralcenter
AT daewonjun roleoffib4forreassessmentofhepaticfibrosisburdeninreferralcenter
AT chulminlee roleoffib4forreassessmentofhepaticfibrosisburdeninreferralcenter
AT mimikim roleoffib4forreassessmentofhepaticfibrosisburdeninreferralcenter
_version_ 1718391132838166528