Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
Abstract The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displace...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6a972aa4dfce48f581198bfd1138045b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6a972aa4dfce48f581198bfd1138045b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6a972aa4dfce48f581198bfd1138045b2021-12-02T15:08:19ZComparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods10.1038/s41598-018-20891-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/6a972aa4dfce48f581198bfd1138045b2018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20891-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displacement curves from the DC test were much smoother and more linear up to the point of fracture when compared to those from the PO test. Compared to the PO test, DC is easier to perform for determining the bond strength between posts and dentin. No specimen alignment is needed in the DC test, and it produces a smaller standard deviation in the measured bond strength. The main disadvantage of the DC test, however, is that finite element analysis (FEA) is required to calculate the bond strength. The shear bond strength given by the PO test based on the simple formula is not valid, though, and the peak failure load is dependent on friction at the post-dentin interface.Laikuan ZhuYuping LiYung-Chung ChenCarola A. CarreraChong WuAlex FokNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Laikuan Zhu Yuping Li Yung-Chung Chen Carola A. Carrera Chong Wu Alex Fok Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
description |
Abstract The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displacement curves from the DC test were much smoother and more linear up to the point of fracture when compared to those from the PO test. Compared to the PO test, DC is easier to perform for determining the bond strength between posts and dentin. No specimen alignment is needed in the DC test, and it produces a smaller standard deviation in the measured bond strength. The main disadvantage of the DC test, however, is that finite element analysis (FEA) is required to calculate the bond strength. The shear bond strength given by the PO test based on the simple formula is not valid, though, and the peak failure load is dependent on friction at the post-dentin interface. |
format |
article |
author |
Laikuan Zhu Yuping Li Yung-Chung Chen Carola A. Carrera Chong Wu Alex Fok |
author_facet |
Laikuan Zhu Yuping Li Yung-Chung Chen Carola A. Carrera Chong Wu Alex Fok |
author_sort |
Laikuan Zhu |
title |
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
title_short |
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
title_full |
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
title_sort |
comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6a972aa4dfce48f581198bfd1138045b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laikuanzhu comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods AT yupingli comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods AT yungchungchen comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods AT carolaacarrera comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods AT chongwu comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods AT alexfok comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods |
_version_ |
1718388190549639168 |