One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis

Donald Sachs,1 Robyn Capobianco,2 Daniel Cher,2 Timothy Holt,3 Mukund Gundanna,4 Timothy Graven,5 A Nick Shamie,6 John Cummings Jr7 1Center for Spinal Stenosis and Neurologic Care, Lakeland, FL, 2SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, 3Montgomery Spine Center, Montgomery, AL, 4Brazos Spine, College Station,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sachs D, Capobianco R, Cher D, Holt T, Gundanna M, Graven T, Shamie AN, Cummings Jr J
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:	Medical technology R855-855.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6aa3a9f43e454c7f86f86fc12198a37d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6aa3a9f43e454c7f86f86fc12198a37d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6aa3a9f43e454c7f86f86fc12198a37d2021-12-02T08:49:17ZOne-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/6aa3a9f43e454c7f86f86fc12198a37d2014-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/one-year-outcomes-after-minimally-invasive-sacroiliac-joint-fusion-wit-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470 Donald Sachs,1 Robyn Capobianco,2 Daniel Cher,2 Timothy Holt,3 Mukund Gundanna,4 Timothy Graven,5 A Nick Shamie,6 John Cummings Jr7 1Center for Spinal Stenosis and Neurologic Care, Lakeland, FL, 2SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, 3Montgomery Spine Center, Montgomery, AL, 4Brazos Spine, College Station, TX, 5SSM Orthopedics, Wentzville, MO, 6UCLA Spine Center, Santa Monica, CA, 7Community Neurosurgical Care, Indianapolis, IN, USA Background: Sacroiliac joint (SI) pain is an often-overlooked cause of lower-back pain, due in part to a lack of specific findings on radiographs and a symptom profile similar to other back-related disorders. A minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach to SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium plasma spray-coated implants has shown favorable outcomes in patients with SI joint pain refractory to conservative care. The aim of this study was to provide a multicenter experience of MIS SI joint fusion using a patient-level analysis. Patients and methods: We report a patient-level analysis from 144 patients with a mean of 16 months postoperative follow-up. Demographic information, perioperative measures, complications, and clinical outcomes using a visual analog scale for pain were collected prospectively. Random-effects regression models were used to account for intersite variability. Results: The mean age was 58 years, 71% of patients were female, and 62% had a history of lumbar spinal fusion. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) operative time was 73 minutes (25.4–118), blood loss was minimal, and hospital stay was 0.8 days (0.1–1.5). At follow-up, mean (95% CI) visual analog scale pain scores improved by 6.1 points (5.7–6.6). Substantial clinical benefit, defined as a decrease in pain by >2.5 points or a score of 3.5 or less, was achieved in 91.9% of patients (95% CI 83.9%–96.1%), and 96% (95% CI 86.3%–98.8%) of patients indicated they would have the same surgery again. Conclusion: When conservative measures fail to relieve symptoms resulting from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint, MIS SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, porous, titanium plasma spray-coated implants is a safe and effective treatment option. Keywords: minimally invasive surgery, sacroiliac joint, SI joint fusion, arthrodesis, previous spine surgerySachs DCapobianco RCher DHolt TGundanna MGraven TShamie ANCummings Jr JDove Medical PressarticleMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 299-304 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medical technology R855-855.5
spellingShingle	Medical technology R855-855.5 Sachs D Capobianco R Cher D Holt T Gundanna M Graven T Shamie AN Cummings Jr J One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
description	Donald Sachs,1 Robyn Capobianco,2 Daniel Cher,2 Timothy Holt,3 Mukund Gundanna,4 Timothy Graven,5 A Nick Shamie,6 John Cummings Jr7 1Center for Spinal Stenosis and Neurologic Care, Lakeland, FL, 2SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, 3Montgomery Spine Center, Montgomery, AL, 4Brazos Spine, College Station, TX, 5SSM Orthopedics, Wentzville, MO, 6UCLA Spine Center, Santa Monica, CA, 7Community Neurosurgical Care, Indianapolis, IN, USA Background: Sacroiliac joint (SI) pain is an often-overlooked cause of lower-back pain, due in part to a lack of specific findings on radiographs and a symptom profile similar to other back-related disorders. A minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach to SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium plasma spray-coated implants has shown favorable outcomes in patients with SI joint pain refractory to conservative care. The aim of this study was to provide a multicenter experience of MIS SI joint fusion using a patient-level analysis. Patients and methods: We report a patient-level analysis from 144 patients with a mean of 16 months postoperative follow-up. Demographic information, perioperative measures, complications, and clinical outcomes using a visual analog scale for pain were collected prospectively. Random-effects regression models were used to account for intersite variability. Results: The mean age was 58 years, 71% of patients were female, and 62% had a history of lumbar spinal fusion. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) operative time was 73 minutes (25.4–118), blood loss was minimal, and hospital stay was 0.8 days (0.1–1.5). At follow-up, mean (95% CI) visual analog scale pain scores improved by 6.1 points (5.7–6.6). Substantial clinical benefit, defined as a decrease in pain by >2.5 points or a score of 3.5 or less, was achieved in 91.9% of patients (95% CI 83.9%–96.1%), and 96% (95% CI 86.3%–98.8%) of patients indicated they would have the same surgery again. Conclusion: When conservative measures fail to relieve symptoms resulting from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint, MIS SI joint fusion using a series of triangular, porous, titanium plasma spray-coated implants is a safe and effective treatment option. Keywords: minimally invasive surgery, sacroiliac joint, SI joint fusion, arthrodesis, previous spine surgery
format	article
author	Sachs D Capobianco R Cher D Holt T Gundanna M Graven T Shamie AN Cummings Jr J
author_facet	Sachs D Capobianco R Cher D Holt T Gundanna M Graven T Shamie AN Cummings Jr J
author_sort	Sachs D
title	One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
title_short	One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
title_full	One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
title_fullStr	One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
title_full_unstemmed	One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
title_sort	one-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/6aa3a9f43e454c7f86f86fc12198a37d
work_keys_str_mv	AT sachsd oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT capobiancor oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT cherd oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT holtt oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT gundannam oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT gravent oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT shamiean oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis AT cummingsjrj oneyearoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionwithaseriesoftriangularimplantsamulticenterpatientlevelanalysis
_version_	1718398366795169792

One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis

Ejemplares similares