Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums
How is it possible that if you go into an arts museum, the ceramics you see may be made yesterday and may be a valued and legitimate part of the museum collection, while in open-air museums, a similar object may be produced by a master craftsperson yesterday, yet is not called authentic? Are we blin...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
EXARC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6aa6514846714c8e96e63b794a894bf7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6aa6514846714c8e96e63b794a894bf7 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6aa6514846714c8e96e63b794a894bf72021-12-01T14:42:35ZDiscussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums2212-8956https://doaj.org/article/6aa6514846714c8e96e63b794a894bf72021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10551https://doaj.org/toc/2212-8956How is it possible that if you go into an arts museum, the ceramics you see may be made yesterday and may be a valued and legitimate part of the museum collection, while in open-air museums, a similar object may be produced by a master craftsperson yesterday, yet is not called authentic? Are we blinded by historical-archaeological authenticity? Is the key to documented objects, their stories and their provenance – which gives them their authenticity - not right? Well-structured documentation of stories with objects and people is, per se, an important step towards being regarded as open-air museums. This is an important part of our current EXARC EU Project, www.retold.eu.For the authors see the articleEXARCarticledocumentationnewer eraopen-air museummethodologynewest eraMuseums. Collectors and collectingAM1-501ArchaeologyCC1-960ENEXARC Journal, Iss 2021/1 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
documentation newer era open-air museum methodology newest era Museums. Collectors and collecting AM1-501 Archaeology CC1-960 |
spellingShingle |
documentation newer era open-air museum methodology newest era Museums. Collectors and collecting AM1-501 Archaeology CC1-960 For the authors see the article Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
description |
How is it possible that if you go into an arts museum, the ceramics you see may be made yesterday and may be a valued and legitimate part of the museum collection, while in open-air museums, a similar object may be produced by a master craftsperson yesterday, yet is not called authentic? Are we blinded by historical-archaeological authenticity? Is the key to documented objects, their stories and their provenance – which gives them their authenticity - not right? Well-structured documentation of stories with objects and people is, per se, an important step towards being regarded as open-air museums. This is an important part of our current EXARC EU Project, www.retold.eu. |
format |
article |
author |
For the authors see the article |
author_facet |
For the authors see the article |
author_sort |
For the authors see the article |
title |
Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
title_short |
Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
title_full |
Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
title_fullStr |
Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discussion: The Concept of Authenticity in Collections of Open-Air Museums |
title_sort |
discussion: the concept of authenticity in collections of open-air museums |
publisher |
EXARC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6aa6514846714c8e96e63b794a894bf7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fortheauthorsseethearticle discussiontheconceptofauthenticityincollectionsofopenairmuseums |
_version_ |
1718404875595808768 |