Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?

A recent study has shown that short-term training in response inhibition can make people more cautious for up to two hours when making decisions. However, the longevity of such training effects is unclear. In this study we tested whether training in the stop-signal paradigm reduces risky gambling wh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Frederick Verbruggen, Rachel C Adams, Felice van 't Wout, Tobias Stevens, Ian P L McLaren, Christopher D Chambers
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6af1c2d99a6f49188f4ed7d89cfeeebc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6af1c2d99a6f49188f4ed7d89cfeeebc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6af1c2d99a6f49188f4ed7d89cfeeebc2021-11-18T09:02:35ZAre the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0070155https://doaj.org/article/6af1c2d99a6f49188f4ed7d89cfeeebc2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23922948/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203A recent study has shown that short-term training in response inhibition can make people more cautious for up to two hours when making decisions. However, the longevity of such training effects is unclear. In this study we tested whether training in the stop-signal paradigm reduces risky gambling when the training and gambling task are separated by 24 hours. Two independent experiments revealed that the aftereffects of stop-signal training are negligible after 24 hours. This was supported by Bayes factors that provided strong support for the null hypothesis. These findings indicate the need to better optimise the parameters of inhibition training to achieve clinical efficacy, potentially by strengthening automatic associations between specific stimuli and stopping.Frederick VerbruggenRachel C AdamsFelice van 't WoutTobias StevensIan P L McLarenChristopher D ChambersPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 7, p e70155 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Frederick Verbruggen Rachel C Adams Felice van 't Wout Tobias Stevens Ian P L McLaren Christopher D Chambers Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
description	A recent study has shown that short-term training in response inhibition can make people more cautious for up to two hours when making decisions. However, the longevity of such training effects is unclear. In this study we tested whether training in the stop-signal paradigm reduces risky gambling when the training and gambling task are separated by 24 hours. Two independent experiments revealed that the aftereffects of stop-signal training are negligible after 24 hours. This was supported by Bayes factors that provided strong support for the null hypothesis. These findings indicate the need to better optimise the parameters of inhibition training to achieve clinical efficacy, potentially by strengthening automatic associations between specific stimuli and stopping.
format	article
author	Frederick Verbruggen Rachel C Adams Felice van 't Wout Tobias Stevens Ian P L McLaren Christopher D Chambers
author_facet	Frederick Verbruggen Rachel C Adams Felice van 't Wout Tobias Stevens Ian P L McLaren Christopher D Chambers
author_sort	Frederick Verbruggen
title	Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
title_short	Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
title_full	Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
title_fullStr	Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
title_full_unstemmed	Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
title_sort	are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/6af1c2d99a6f49188f4ed7d89cfeeebc
work_keys_str_mv	AT frederickverbruggen aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting AT rachelcadams aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting AT felicevantwout aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting AT tobiasstevens aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting AT ianplmclaren aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting AT christopherdchambers aretheeffectsofresponseinhibitionongamblinglonglasting
_version_	1718420968899084288

Are the effects of response inhibition on gambling long-lasting?

Ejemplares similares