BAK additive influence on results
Rupali D Shah, Thomas I Lemon, Ashley Yarrow-JenkinsInstitute of Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UKThis letter is in regards to Fukuda et al.1 We thank the authors for their informative contribution. The use of rabbit specimens was relevant to this study as previously alluded...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6b372d79beec4ddbaa2b67d65030f287 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6b372d79beec4ddbaa2b67d65030f287 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6b372d79beec4ddbaa2b67d65030f2872021-12-02T00:56:57ZBAK additive influence on results1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/6b372d79beec4ddbaa2b67d65030f2872013-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/bak-additive-influence-on-results-a13267https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Rupali D Shah, Thomas I Lemon, Ashley Yarrow-JenkinsInstitute of Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UKThis letter is in regards to Fukuda et al.1 We thank the authors for their informative contribution. The use of rabbit specimens was relevant to this study as previously alluded to by Wilhelmus, who concluded from his research that rabbit eyes were more susceptible to irritants than human eyes.2View original paper by Fukuda and colleagues.Shah RDLemon TIYarrow-Jenkins ADove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2013, Iss default, Pp 1081-1082 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 |
spellingShingle |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 Shah RD Lemon TI Yarrow-Jenkins A BAK additive influence on results |
description |
Rupali D Shah, Thomas I Lemon, Ashley Yarrow-JenkinsInstitute of Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UKThis letter is in regards to Fukuda et al.1 We thank the authors for their informative contribution. The use of rabbit specimens was relevant to this study as previously alluded to by Wilhelmus, who concluded from his research that rabbit eyes were more susceptible to irritants than human eyes.2View original paper by Fukuda and colleagues. |
format |
article |
author |
Shah RD Lemon TI Yarrow-Jenkins A |
author_facet |
Shah RD Lemon TI Yarrow-Jenkins A |
author_sort |
Shah RD |
title |
BAK additive influence on results |
title_short |
BAK additive influence on results |
title_full |
BAK additive influence on results |
title_fullStr |
BAK additive influence on results |
title_full_unstemmed |
BAK additive influence on results |
title_sort |
bak additive influence on results |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6b372d79beec4ddbaa2b67d65030f287 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shahrd bakadditiveinfluenceonresults AT lemonti bakadditiveinfluenceonresults AT yarrowjenkinsa bakadditiveinfluenceonresults |
_version_ |
1718403389309583360 |