Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Binta Sultan,1,2 Paul Benn,1 Laura Waters1 1Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK Abstract: The incidence of human immunodeficie...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sultan B, Benn P, Waters L
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6b84243250dc491e8fb5c11927e78e3d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6b84243250dc491e8fb5c11927e78e3d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6b84243250dc491e8fb5c11927e78e3d2021-12-02T04:26:05ZCurrent perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis1179-1373https://doaj.org/article/6b84243250dc491e8fb5c11927e78e3d2014-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/current-perspectives-in-hiv-post-exposure-prophylaxis-peer-reviewed-article-HIVhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1373 Binta Sultan,1,2 Paul Benn,1 Laura Waters1 1Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK Abstract: The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to rise among core groups and efforts to reduce the numbers of new infections are being redoubled. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is the use of short-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the risk of acquisition of HIV infection following exposure. Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of ART within 36–72 hours of exposure to HIV. As long as individuals continue to be exposed to HIV there will be a role for PEP in the foreseeable future. Nonoccupational PEP, the vast majority of which is for sexual exposure (PEPSE), has a significant role to play in HIV prevention efforts. Awareness of PEP and its availability for both clinicians and those who are eligible to receive it are crucial to ensure that PEP is used to its full potential in any HIV prevention strategy. In this review, we provide current evidence for the use of PEPSE, assessment of the risk of HIV transmission, indications for PEP, drug regimens, and management of patients started on PEP. We summarize national and international guidelines for the use of PEPSE. We explore the place of PEP within the wider strategy of reducing HIV incidence rates in the era of treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis. We also consider the implications of recent data from interventional and observational studies demonstrating significant reductions in the risk of HIV transmission within a serodiscordant relationship if the HIV-positive partner is taking effective ART upon PEP guidelines. Keywords: post-exposure prophylaxis, pre-exposure prophylaxis, treatment as prevention, human immunodeficiency virusSultan BBenn PWaters LDove Medical PressarticleImmunologic diseases. AllergyRC581-607ENHIV/AIDS: Research and Palliative Care, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 147-158 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
spellingShingle Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
Sultan B
Benn P
Waters L
Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
description Binta Sultan,1,2 Paul Benn,1 Laura Waters1 1Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK Abstract: The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to rise among core groups and efforts to reduce the numbers of new infections are being redoubled. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is the use of short-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the risk of acquisition of HIV infection following exposure. Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of ART within 36–72 hours of exposure to HIV. As long as individuals continue to be exposed to HIV there will be a role for PEP in the foreseeable future. Nonoccupational PEP, the vast majority of which is for sexual exposure (PEPSE), has a significant role to play in HIV prevention efforts. Awareness of PEP and its availability for both clinicians and those who are eligible to receive it are crucial to ensure that PEP is used to its full potential in any HIV prevention strategy. In this review, we provide current evidence for the use of PEPSE, assessment of the risk of HIV transmission, indications for PEP, drug regimens, and management of patients started on PEP. We summarize national and international guidelines for the use of PEPSE. We explore the place of PEP within the wider strategy of reducing HIV incidence rates in the era of treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis. We also consider the implications of recent data from interventional and observational studies demonstrating significant reductions in the risk of HIV transmission within a serodiscordant relationship if the HIV-positive partner is taking effective ART upon PEP guidelines. Keywords: post-exposure prophylaxis, pre-exposure prophylaxis, treatment as prevention, human immunodeficiency virus
format article
author Sultan B
Benn P
Waters L
author_facet Sultan B
Benn P
Waters L
author_sort Sultan B
title Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
title_short Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
title_full Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
title_fullStr Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
title_sort current perspectives in hiv post-exposure prophylaxis
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/6b84243250dc491e8fb5c11927e78e3d
work_keys_str_mv AT sultanb currentperspectivesinhivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT bennp currentperspectivesinhivpostexposureprophylaxis
AT watersl currentperspectivesinhivpostexposureprophylaxis
_version_ 1718401189874237440