Fitness & Sports Medicine
Objective: Existing literature has shown heart rate recovery one minute (HRR1) after exercise termination in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to correlate with performance, although no data exist on HRR3 and 5 in a population without manifest cardiovascular disease. We aimed to analyze whethe...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DE EN |
| Publicado: |
Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6b9cf7d3a67b413b8b0cf37345a4ee3b |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6b9cf7d3a67b413b8b0cf37345a4ee3b |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6b9cf7d3a67b413b8b0cf37345a4ee3b2021-11-16T19:01:40ZFitness & Sports Medicine0344-59252510-526410.5960/dzsm.2019.402https://doaj.org/article/6b9cf7d3a67b413b8b0cf37345a4ee3b2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archiv/archive-2020/issue-1/correlation-of-heart-rate-recovery-aerobic-physical-activity-and-performance-a-sub-analysis-of-the-euro-ex-trial/https://doaj.org/toc/0344-5925https://doaj.org/toc/2510-5264Objective: Existing literature has shown heart rate recovery one minute (HRR1) after exercise termination in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to correlate with performance, although no data exist on HRR3 and 5 in a population without manifest cardiovascular disease. We aimed to analyze whether HRR3 and 5 correlate with relative oxygen uptake at peak performance (V O2peak) and maximal power (Pmax) as well as with weekly physical activity (PA).Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of the Euro(pean)Ex(ercise) trial enrolling subjects between 50 and 70 years of age without manifest cardiovascular disease (n=59). Subjects underwent CPET following an individualized ramp protocol with an exercise duration between 10 and 14 minutes. Results: V O2peak (35.69.0 ml/kg/min) and Pmax(245.380.4 W) correlated significantly with HRR1 (22.67.9/min, both p<.001; r=0.50 and 0.48), 3 (44.57.7/min, p=0.018 and 0.010; r=0.33 and 0.35) and 5 (64.814.0/min, p=0.002 and 0.001; r=0.77 and 0.72) in our study population (56.68.2 years). HRR5 correlated more strongly with PA than HRR1 and HRR3 (HRR5: p<0.001; r=0.51; HRR1: p=0.277; r=0.15; HRR3: p=0.156; r=0.20). Subjects with PA>5h/week (8.82.0) differed significantly from those with no regular sports in terms of HRR5 (p<0.010) and V O2peak (p<0.001). Conclusions: HRR5 is a better predictor for maximal exercise capacity than HRR1 or 3.Clinical Relevance: HRR5 should be included in exercise testing.KEY WORDS: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, Heart Rate Recovery, Aerobic Physical ActivityWernhart SGuazzi MHalle M.Dynamic Media Sales VerlagarticleSports medicineRC1200-1245DEENDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, Vol 71, Iss 1 (2020) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
DE EN |
| topic |
Sports medicine RC1200-1245 |
| spellingShingle |
Sports medicine RC1200-1245 Wernhart S Guazzi M Halle M. Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| description |
Objective: Existing literature has shown heart rate recovery one minute (HRR1) after exercise termination in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to correlate with performance, although no data exist on HRR3 and 5 in a population without manifest cardiovascular disease. We aimed to analyze whether HRR3 and 5 correlate with relative oxygen uptake at peak performance (V O2peak) and maximal power (Pmax) as well as with weekly physical activity (PA).Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of the Euro(pean)Ex(ercise) trial enrolling subjects between 50 and 70 years of age without manifest cardiovascular disease (n=59). Subjects underwent CPET following an individualized ramp protocol with an exercise duration between 10 and 14 minutes. Results: V O2peak (35.69.0 ml/kg/min) and Pmax(245.380.4 W) correlated significantly with HRR1 (22.67.9/min, both p<.001; r=0.50 and 0.48), 3 (44.57.7/min, p=0.018 and 0.010; r=0.33 and 0.35) and 5 (64.814.0/min, p=0.002 and 0.001; r=0.77 and 0.72) in our study population (56.68.2 years). HRR5 correlated more strongly with PA than HRR1 and HRR3 (HRR5: p<0.001; r=0.51; HRR1: p=0.277; r=0.15; HRR3: p=0.156; r=0.20). Subjects with PA>5h/week (8.82.0) differed significantly from those with no regular sports in terms of HRR5 (p<0.010) and V O2peak (p<0.001). Conclusions: HRR5 is a better predictor for maximal exercise capacity than HRR1 or 3.Clinical Relevance: HRR5 should be included in exercise testing.KEY WORDS: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, Heart Rate Recovery, Aerobic Physical Activity |
| format |
article |
| author |
Wernhart S Guazzi M Halle M. |
| author_facet |
Wernhart S Guazzi M Halle M. |
| author_sort |
Wernhart S |
| title |
Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| title_short |
Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| title_full |
Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| title_fullStr |
Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Fitness & Sports Medicine |
| title_sort |
fitness & sports medicine |
| publisher |
Dynamic Media Sales Verlag |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/6b9cf7d3a67b413b8b0cf37345a4ee3b |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT wernharts fitnessampsportsmedicine AT guazzim fitnessampsportsmedicine AT hallem fitnessampsportsmedicine |
| _version_ |
1718426243565617152 |