Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios

This paper innovatively analyses the joint occurrence of cognitive biases in groups of stock exchange investors. It considers jointly a number of common fallacies: confirmation bias, loss aversion, gambler’s fallacy, availability cascade, hot-hand fallacy, bandwagon effect, and Dunning–Kruger effect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adele Ossareh, Mohammad Saeed Pourjafar, Tomasz Kopczewski
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6bab9682b0ee4d658edb4a36f90065df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6bab9682b0ee4d658edb4a36f90065df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6bab9682b0ee4d658edb4a36f90065df2021-11-25T16:40:46ZCognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios10.3390/app1122109162076-3417https://doaj.org/article/6bab9682b0ee4d658edb4a36f90065df2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10916https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417This paper innovatively analyses the joint occurrence of cognitive biases in groups of stock exchange investors. It considers jointly a number of common fallacies: confirmation bias, loss aversion, gambler’s fallacy, availability cascade, hot-hand fallacy, bandwagon effect, and Dunning–Kruger effect, which have hitherto been studied separately. The paper aims to highlight the diverse range of investor’s profiles which are characterised by such fallacies, and the considerable differences observed based on their age, stock market experience and perception of market trends. The analysis is based on k-means and hierarchical clustering, feature importance and Principal Component Analysis, which were applied to data from the Tehran Stock Exchange. There are a few essential findings which contribute to the existing literature. Firstly, the results show that gender does not have a role to play in diversifying the investors’ profiles. Secondly, cognitive biases are bundled, and we distinguish four investors’ profiles; thus, they should be analysed jointly, not separately. Thirdly, the exposure to cognitive biases differs significantly due to the individual features of investors. The group most vulnerable to almost all analysed biases are inexperienced investors, who are pessimistic about market developments and have invested a large amount. Fourthly, the ages of investors are essential only in connection with other factors such as experience, market perception and investment exposure. Young (20–40 years), experienced investors with huge investments (+1000 mln rials/+24,000 USD) are mostly less exposed to all biases and much less risk-averse. Additionally, older (50+) and experienced investors (5–10 years) who are more optimistic about trends (hot hand bias) were affected much less by cognitive biases, only showing vulnerability to the Dunning–Kruger effect. Fifthly, more than 40% of investors apply consultation and technical analysis approaches to succeed in trading. Finally, from a methodological perspective, this study shows that unsupervised learning methods are effective in profiling investors and bundling similar behaviours.Adele OssarehMohammad Saeed PourjafarTomasz KopczewskiMDPI AGarticlecognitive biasstock marketbehavioural financeinvestor’s profileTeheran Stock Exchangeunsupervised learningTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10916, p 10916 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cognitive bias
stock market
behavioural finance
investor’s profile
Teheran Stock Exchange
unsupervised learning
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle cognitive bias
stock market
behavioural finance
investor’s profile
Teheran Stock Exchange
unsupervised learning
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Adele Ossareh
Mohammad Saeed Pourjafar
Tomasz Kopczewski
Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
description This paper innovatively analyses the joint occurrence of cognitive biases in groups of stock exchange investors. It considers jointly a number of common fallacies: confirmation bias, loss aversion, gambler’s fallacy, availability cascade, hot-hand fallacy, bandwagon effect, and Dunning–Kruger effect, which have hitherto been studied separately. The paper aims to highlight the diverse range of investor’s profiles which are characterised by such fallacies, and the considerable differences observed based on their age, stock market experience and perception of market trends. The analysis is based on k-means and hierarchical clustering, feature importance and Principal Component Analysis, which were applied to data from the Tehran Stock Exchange. There are a few essential findings which contribute to the existing literature. Firstly, the results show that gender does not have a role to play in diversifying the investors’ profiles. Secondly, cognitive biases are bundled, and we distinguish four investors’ profiles; thus, they should be analysed jointly, not separately. Thirdly, the exposure to cognitive biases differs significantly due to the individual features of investors. The group most vulnerable to almost all analysed biases are inexperienced investors, who are pessimistic about market developments and have invested a large amount. Fourthly, the ages of investors are essential only in connection with other factors such as experience, market perception and investment exposure. Young (20–40 years), experienced investors with huge investments (+1000 mln rials/+24,000 USD) are mostly less exposed to all biases and much less risk-averse. Additionally, older (50+) and experienced investors (5–10 years) who are more optimistic about trends (hot hand bias) were affected much less by cognitive biases, only showing vulnerability to the Dunning–Kruger effect. Fifthly, more than 40% of investors apply consultation and technical analysis approaches to succeed in trading. Finally, from a methodological perspective, this study shows that unsupervised learning methods are effective in profiling investors and bundling similar behaviours.
format article
author Adele Ossareh
Mohammad Saeed Pourjafar
Tomasz Kopczewski
author_facet Adele Ossareh
Mohammad Saeed Pourjafar
Tomasz Kopczewski
author_sort Adele Ossareh
title Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
title_short Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
title_full Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
title_fullStr Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Biases on the Iran Stock Exchange: Unsupervised Learning Approach to Examining Feature Bundles in Investors’ Portfolios
title_sort cognitive biases on the iran stock exchange: unsupervised learning approach to examining feature bundles in investors’ portfolios
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6bab9682b0ee4d658edb4a36f90065df
work_keys_str_mv AT adeleossareh cognitivebiasesontheiranstockexchangeunsupervisedlearningapproachtoexaminingfeaturebundlesininvestorsportfolios
AT mohammadsaeedpourjafar cognitivebiasesontheiranstockexchangeunsupervisedlearningapproachtoexaminingfeaturebundlesininvestorsportfolios
AT tomaszkopczewski cognitivebiasesontheiranstockexchangeunsupervisedlearningapproachtoexaminingfeaturebundlesininvestorsportfolios
_version_ 1718413081711738880