Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood

The objective of this study was to establish the occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus in several species of sea fish and mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). The study included a total of 33 samples of frozen sea fish and 64 samples of fresh wild and farmed mussels purcha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Deyan Stratev, Todor Stoyanchev, Desislava Bangieva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN IT
Publicado:	PAGEPress Publications 2021
Materias:	Vibrio parahaemolyticus Staphylococcus aureus occurrence seafood Food processing and manufacture TP368-456
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6bb15f04058e49109de1371f0bdfa4c2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6bb15f04058e49109de1371f0bdfa4c2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6bb15f04058e49109de1371f0bdfa4c22021-12-03T21:41:37ZOccurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood10.4081/ijfs.2021.100272239-7132https://doaj.org/article/6bb15f04058e49109de1371f0bdfa4c22021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/10027https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 The objective of this study was to establish the occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus in several species of sea fish and mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). The study included a total of 33 samples of frozen sea fish and 64 samples of fresh wild and farmed mussels purchased from the stores. V. parahaemolyticus was isolated and confirmed via PCR in 2 (6%) fish samples (Atlantic cod and Alaska pollock) and 20 (31%) mussel samples. S. aureus was also isolated and confirmed via PCR in 2 (6%) fish samples (Argentine hake and Atlantic cod). Significant differences were found in the total bacterial contamination between wild mussels (6.54 log cfu/g) and farmed mussels (6.69 log cfu/g). Total V. parahaemolyticus count did not show significant differences either between wild (4.45 log cfu/g) and farmed mussels (4.99 log cfu/g). In wild mussels the S. aureus count was found to be 4.50 log cfu/g, while in farmed mussels it was 3.14 log cfu/g. The occurrence of V. parahaemolyticus and S. aureus in fish and mussels presents a risk to the consumer’s health. Deyan StratevTodor StoyanchevDesislava BangievaPAGEPress PublicationsarticleVibrio parahaemolyticusStaphylococcus aureusoccurrenceseafoodFood processing and manufactureTP368-456ENITItalian Journal of Food Safety, Vol 10, Iss 4 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN IT
topic	Vibrio parahaemolyticus Staphylococcus aureus occurrence seafood Food processing and manufacture TP368-456
spellingShingle	Vibrio parahaemolyticus Staphylococcus aureus occurrence seafood Food processing and manufacture TP368-456 Deyan Stratev Todor Stoyanchev Desislava Bangieva Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
description	The objective of this study was to establish the occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus in several species of sea fish and mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). The study included a total of 33 samples of frozen sea fish and 64 samples of fresh wild and farmed mussels purchased from the stores. V. parahaemolyticus was isolated and confirmed via PCR in 2 (6%) fish samples (Atlantic cod and Alaska pollock) and 20 (31%) mussel samples. S. aureus was also isolated and confirmed via PCR in 2 (6%) fish samples (Argentine hake and Atlantic cod). Significant differences were found in the total bacterial contamination between wild mussels (6.54 log cfu/g) and farmed mussels (6.69 log cfu/g). Total V. parahaemolyticus count did not show significant differences either between wild (4.45 log cfu/g) and farmed mussels (4.99 log cfu/g). In wild mussels the S. aureus count was found to be 4.50 log cfu/g, while in farmed mussels it was 3.14 log cfu/g. The occurrence of V. parahaemolyticus and S. aureus in fish and mussels presents a risk to the consumer’s health.
format	article
author	Deyan Stratev Todor Stoyanchev Desislava Bangieva
author_facet	Deyan Stratev Todor Stoyanchev Desislava Bangieva
author_sort	Deyan Stratev
title	Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
title_short	Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
title_full	Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
title_fullStr	Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
title_full_unstemmed	Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
title_sort	occurrence of <em>vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood
publisher	PAGEPress Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/6bb15f04058e49109de1371f0bdfa4c2
work_keys_str_mv	AT deyanstratev occurrenceofemvibrioparahaemolyticusemandemstaphylococcusaureuseminseafood AT todorstoyanchev occurrenceofemvibrioparahaemolyticusemandemstaphylococcusaureuseminseafood AT desislavabangieva occurrenceofemvibrioparahaemolyticusemandemstaphylococcusaureuseminseafood
_version_	1718373082702282752

Occurrence of <em>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in seafood

Ejemplares similares