Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees

Recent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolas J. Vereecken, Timothy Weekers, Nicolas Leclercq, Stéphane De Greef, Hélène Hainaut, Jean-Marc Molenberg, Youri Martin, Xavier Janssens, Grégoire Noël, Alain Pauly, Stuart P.M. Roberts, Leon Marshall
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e2021-12-01T04:36:11ZInsect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107132https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20310712https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XRecent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in aerial insect community structure. Here, we investigated the relationship between the total biomass of wild bees collected using pan traps in urban, agricultural, and semi-natural habitats on one hand, and a spectrum of biodiversity metrics on the other hand, particularly species richness (SR), alpha diversity, functional diversity (FD) and three different forms of phylogenetic diversity (PD). Our results indicate that although biomass is significantly and highly correlated with the abundance of wild bees, it is generally significantly but only moderately and non-linearly correlated to the various facets of wild bee diversity among habitats. By contrast, we also found that all three measures of PD used are consistent across habitats, suggesting that a taxonomic hierarchy based on Linnaean classification could be used as a proxy for the measurement of PD in wild bees, particularly in other well-studied areas such as Western Europe where a multi-gene molecular phylogeny is unavailable as yet. Collectively, our results illustrate the clear limitations of biodiversity monitoring through measures of trapped insects biomass. We advocate for more robust measures of biodiversity trends in wild bees, requiring both standardized surveys, and the identification of caught specimens down to the species level to capture the subtleties of species, traits-based and phylogeny-based community changes across habitats or time. Scaling out this approach is an essential prerequisite for more global conservation planning tailored to the ecological requirements of the targeted insect species.Nicolas J. VereeckenTimothy WeekersNicolas LeclercqStéphane De GreefHélène HainautJean-Marc MolenbergYouri MartinXavier JanssensGrégoire NoëlAlain PaulyStuart P.M. RobertsLeon MarshallElsevierarticleWild beesCommunity assemblyConservationBiomassBiodiversityEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 121, Iss , Pp 107132- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Wild bees
Community assembly
Conservation
Biomass
Biodiversity
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Wild bees
Community assembly
Conservation
Biomass
Biodiversity
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Nicolas J. Vereecken
Timothy Weekers
Nicolas Leclercq
Stéphane De Greef
Hélène Hainaut
Jean-Marc Molenberg
Youri Martin
Xavier Janssens
Grégoire Noël
Alain Pauly
Stuart P.M. Roberts
Leon Marshall
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
description Recent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in aerial insect community structure. Here, we investigated the relationship between the total biomass of wild bees collected using pan traps in urban, agricultural, and semi-natural habitats on one hand, and a spectrum of biodiversity metrics on the other hand, particularly species richness (SR), alpha diversity, functional diversity (FD) and three different forms of phylogenetic diversity (PD). Our results indicate that although biomass is significantly and highly correlated with the abundance of wild bees, it is generally significantly but only moderately and non-linearly correlated to the various facets of wild bee diversity among habitats. By contrast, we also found that all three measures of PD used are consistent across habitats, suggesting that a taxonomic hierarchy based on Linnaean classification could be used as a proxy for the measurement of PD in wild bees, particularly in other well-studied areas such as Western Europe where a multi-gene molecular phylogeny is unavailable as yet. Collectively, our results illustrate the clear limitations of biodiversity monitoring through measures of trapped insects biomass. We advocate for more robust measures of biodiversity trends in wild bees, requiring both standardized surveys, and the identification of caught specimens down to the species level to capture the subtleties of species, traits-based and phylogeny-based community changes across habitats or time. Scaling out this approach is an essential prerequisite for more global conservation planning tailored to the ecological requirements of the targeted insect species.
format article
author Nicolas J. Vereecken
Timothy Weekers
Nicolas Leclercq
Stéphane De Greef
Hélène Hainaut
Jean-Marc Molenberg
Youri Martin
Xavier Janssens
Grégoire Noël
Alain Pauly
Stuart P.M. Roberts
Leon Marshall
author_facet Nicolas J. Vereecken
Timothy Weekers
Nicolas Leclercq
Stéphane De Greef
Hélène Hainaut
Jean-Marc Molenberg
Youri Martin
Xavier Janssens
Grégoire Noël
Alain Pauly
Stuart P.M. Roberts
Leon Marshall
author_sort Nicolas J. Vereecken
title Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
title_short Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
title_full Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
title_fullStr Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
title_full_unstemmed Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
title_sort insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasjvereecken insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT timothyweekers insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT nicolasleclercq insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT stephanedegreef insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT helenehainaut insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT jeanmarcmolenberg insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT yourimartin insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT xavierjanssens insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT gregoirenoel insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT alainpauly insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT stuartpmroberts insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
AT leonmarshall insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees
_version_ 1718405848498176000