Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
Recent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e2021-12-01T04:36:11ZInsect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107132https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20310712https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XRecent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in aerial insect community structure. Here, we investigated the relationship between the total biomass of wild bees collected using pan traps in urban, agricultural, and semi-natural habitats on one hand, and a spectrum of biodiversity metrics on the other hand, particularly species richness (SR), alpha diversity, functional diversity (FD) and three different forms of phylogenetic diversity (PD). Our results indicate that although biomass is significantly and highly correlated with the abundance of wild bees, it is generally significantly but only moderately and non-linearly correlated to the various facets of wild bee diversity among habitats. By contrast, we also found that all three measures of PD used are consistent across habitats, suggesting that a taxonomic hierarchy based on Linnaean classification could be used as a proxy for the measurement of PD in wild bees, particularly in other well-studied areas such as Western Europe where a multi-gene molecular phylogeny is unavailable as yet. Collectively, our results illustrate the clear limitations of biodiversity monitoring through measures of trapped insects biomass. We advocate for more robust measures of biodiversity trends in wild bees, requiring both standardized surveys, and the identification of caught specimens down to the species level to capture the subtleties of species, traits-based and phylogeny-based community changes across habitats or time. Scaling out this approach is an essential prerequisite for more global conservation planning tailored to the ecological requirements of the targeted insect species.Nicolas J. VereeckenTimothy WeekersNicolas LeclercqStéphane De GreefHélène HainautJean-Marc MolenbergYouri MartinXavier JanssensGrégoire NoëlAlain PaulyStuart P.M. RobertsLeon MarshallElsevierarticleWild beesCommunity assemblyConservationBiomassBiodiversityEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 121, Iss , Pp 107132- (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Wild bees Community assembly Conservation Biomass Biodiversity Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Wild bees Community assembly Conservation Biomass Biodiversity Ecology QH540-549.5 Nicolas J. Vereecken Timothy Weekers Nicolas Leclercq Stéphane De Greef Hélène Hainaut Jean-Marc Molenberg Youri Martin Xavier Janssens Grégoire Noël Alain Pauly Stuart P.M. Roberts Leon Marshall Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
description |
Recent studies have reported on dramatic cases of aerial insect population declines by focusing on the measure of the total biomass of caught insects. However, there is currently no consensus about how biomass patterns among sites and habitats might consistently capture the subtleties of changes in aerial insect community structure. Here, we investigated the relationship between the total biomass of wild bees collected using pan traps in urban, agricultural, and semi-natural habitats on one hand, and a spectrum of biodiversity metrics on the other hand, particularly species richness (SR), alpha diversity, functional diversity (FD) and three different forms of phylogenetic diversity (PD). Our results indicate that although biomass is significantly and highly correlated with the abundance of wild bees, it is generally significantly but only moderately and non-linearly correlated to the various facets of wild bee diversity among habitats. By contrast, we also found that all three measures of PD used are consistent across habitats, suggesting that a taxonomic hierarchy based on Linnaean classification could be used as a proxy for the measurement of PD in wild bees, particularly in other well-studied areas such as Western Europe where a multi-gene molecular phylogeny is unavailable as yet. Collectively, our results illustrate the clear limitations of biodiversity monitoring through measures of trapped insects biomass. We advocate for more robust measures of biodiversity trends in wild bees, requiring both standardized surveys, and the identification of caught specimens down to the species level to capture the subtleties of species, traits-based and phylogeny-based community changes across habitats or time. Scaling out this approach is an essential prerequisite for more global conservation planning tailored to the ecological requirements of the targeted insect species. |
format |
article |
author |
Nicolas J. Vereecken Timothy Weekers Nicolas Leclercq Stéphane De Greef Hélène Hainaut Jean-Marc Molenberg Youri Martin Xavier Janssens Grégoire Noël Alain Pauly Stuart P.M. Roberts Leon Marshall |
author_facet |
Nicolas J. Vereecken Timothy Weekers Nicolas Leclercq Stéphane De Greef Hélène Hainaut Jean-Marc Molenberg Youri Martin Xavier Janssens Grégoire Noël Alain Pauly Stuart P.M. Roberts Leon Marshall |
author_sort |
Nicolas J. Vereecken |
title |
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
title_short |
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
title_full |
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
title_fullStr |
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
title_full_unstemmed |
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
title_sort |
insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/6bc2216835c44a47bff028b1b5415e2e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicolasjvereecken insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT timothyweekers insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT nicolasleclercq insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT stephanedegreef insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT helenehainaut insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT jeanmarcmolenberg insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT yourimartin insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT xavierjanssens insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT gregoirenoel insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT alainpauly insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT stuartpmroberts insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees AT leonmarshall insectbiomassisnotaconsistentproxyforbiodiversitymetricsinwildbees |
_version_ |
1718405848498176000 |